Leah Kaye1, Erica Anspach Will1, Alison Bartolucci1, John Nulsen1, Claudio Benadiva1, Lawrence Engmann2. 1. Center for Advanced Reproductive Services, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut Health Center, 2 Batterson Park Road, Farmington, CT, 06032-6224, USA. 2. Center for Advanced Reproductive Services, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut Health Center, 2 Batterson Park Road, Farmington, CT, 06032-6224, USA. lengmann@uchc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in cycles with single embryo transfer (SET) of blastocysts cryopreserved on day 5 or day 6. Our aim was to determine whether day 6 blastocysts perform adequately to recommend SET. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 468 transfer cycles for 392 women younger than age 38 undergoing SET at a university-affiliated IVF clinic in the USA. A total of 261 day 5 blastocysts and 207 day 6 blastocysts for frozen-thawed SET between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. Data included cryopreservation by both a slow freeze method and vitrification. RESULTS: In total, 59.0% of day 5 SET cycles resulted in a clinical pregnancy compared to 54.1% of day 6 blastocysts (p = 0.54). Ongoing pregnancy rates from day 5 frozen-thawed blastocysts (51.7%) were comparable to day 6 (44.9%, p = 0.14). When looking at vitrified blastocysts only, there were no significant differences between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 69.2% for day 5 and 72.5% for day 6 (p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: SETs of day 6 cryopreserved blastocysts resulted in similar clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates compared to day 5, particularly after vitrification.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in cycles with single embryo transfer (SET) of blastocysts cryopreserved on day 5 or day 6. Our aim was to determine whether day 6 blastocysts perform adequately to recommend SET. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 468 transfer cycles for 392 women younger than age 38 undergoing SET at a university-affiliated IVF clinic in the USA. A total of 261 day 5 blastocysts and 207 day 6 blastocysts for frozen-thawed SET between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. Data included cryopreservation by both a slow freeze method and vitrification. RESULTS: In total, 59.0% of day 5 SET cycles resulted in a clinical pregnancy compared to 54.1% of day 6 blastocysts (p = 0.54). Ongoing pregnancy rates from day 5 frozen-thawed blastocysts (51.7%) were comparable to day 6 (44.9%, p = 0.14). When looking at vitrified blastocysts only, there were no significant differences between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 69.2% for day 5 and 72.5% for day 6 (p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: SETs of day 6 cryopreserved blastocysts resulted in similar clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates compared to day 5, particularly after vitrification.
Entities:
Keywords:
Day 5 blastocyst transfer; Day 6 blastocyst transfer; Delayed blastulation; Frozen embryo transfer; Single embryo transfer
Authors: Kevin S Richter; Daniella K Ginsburg; Sharon K Shipley; Josh Lim; Michael J Tucker; James R Graham; Michael J Levy Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Ann Thurin; Jon Hausken; Torbjörn Hillensjö; Barbara Jablonowska; Anja Pinborg; Annika Strandell; Christina Bergh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: George Kovalevsky; Stacy M Carney; Linda S Morrison; Caitlin F Boylan; Adrienne B Neithardt; Ronald F Feinberg Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Jigal Haas; Jim Meriano; Carl Laskin; Yaakov Bentov; Eran Barzilay; Robert F Casper; Ken Cadesky Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Jinpeng Rao; Feng Qiu; Shen Tian; Ya Yu; Ying Zhang; Zheng Gu; Yiting Cai; Fan Jin; Min Jin Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 1.671