Literature DB >> 21895955

Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer cycles.

T El-Toukhy1, E Wharf, R Walavalkar, A Singh, V Bolton, Y Khalaf, P Braude.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of transfer of thawed blastocysts frozen on either day 5 or day 6 after in vitro fertilisation.
DESIGN: Cohort observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary assisted conception unit in London, UK. POPULATION: Six hundred and forty-two consecutive nondonor programmed thawed blastocyst transfer (TBT) cycles.
METHODS: High-grade blastocysts were frozen on day 5 (n = 314) or day 6 (n = 328) after fertilisation using a slow-freezing protocol. Endometrial preparation was performed using estradiol valerate. Progesterone supplementation was commenced when the endometrial thickness had reached 7 mm or more. Frozen blastocysts were thawed on day 6 of progesterone supplementation and assessed immediately after thawing for survival, and after 3-4 hours for blastocoele re-expansion. Main outcome measures Thawed blastocyst survival and re-expansion rates, and pregnancy and live birth rates, per TBT.
RESULTS: Thawed blastocyst survival and re-expansion rates were comparable between the day 5 and day 6 groups (87% versus 87%, P = 0.50 and 73% versus 71%, P = 0.35, respectively). The live birth rate was similar between the two groups (29% versus 28.5%, P = 0.93, respectively). After adjusting for confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) of a live birth in cycles in which the thawed blastocysts were frozen on day 6 compared with day 5 was 1.23 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-1.86, P = 0.34].
CONCLUSION: The pregnancy potential of high-grade blastocysts frozen on day 5 and day 6 after in vitro fertilisation and replaced in programmed TBT cycles is comparable.
© 2011 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 RCOG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895955     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03101.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  20 in total

1.  Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze.

Authors:  Leah Kaye; Erica Anspach Will; Alison Bartolucci; John Nulsen; Claudio Benadiva; Lawrence Engmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Authors:  Alice Tubbing; Chloë Shaw-Jackson; Lieveke Ameye; Jérôme Colin; Serge Rozenberg; Candice Autin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Extended culture of poor-quality supernumerary embryos improves ART outcomes.

Authors:  Amira Sallem; Pietro Santulli; Virginie Barraud-Lange; Nathalie Le Foll; Lucile Ferreux; Chloé Maignien; Mathilde Bourdon; Charles Chapron; Dominique de Ziegler; Jean-Philippe Wolf; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between single and double vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer according to the day of vitrification.

Authors:  Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; San Hyun Yoon; Joo Cheol Kim; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients.

Authors:  Amy Kaing; Lindsay L Kroener; Robyn Tassin; Man Li; Lian Liu; Richard Buyalos; Gary Hubert; Mousa Shamonki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Developmentally delayed cleavage-stage embryos maintain comparable implantation rates in frozen embryo transfers.

Authors:  Heather Burks; Jennifer Buckbinder; Mary Francis-Hernandez; Karine Chung; Sami Jabara; Kristin Bendikson; Richard Paulson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program.

Authors:  G M Yerushalmi; T Shavit; S Avraham; M Youngster; A Kedem; I Gat; U S Dorofeyeva; S Mashiach; E Schiff; A Shulman; D S Seidman; A Wiser; E Maman; A Hourvitz; M Baum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Day 5 vs day 6 single euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: which variables do have an impact on the clinical pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Hongyi Yang; Qingling Yang; Shanjun Dai; Gang Li; Haixia Jin; Guidong Yao; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.