Literature DB >> 34021226

Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program.

G M Yerushalmi1, T Shavit2, S Avraham3, M Youngster1, A Kedem1, I Gat1, U S Dorofeyeva4, S Mashiach2, E Schiff2, A Shulman2, D S Seidman2, A Wiser5,6, E Maman5, A Hourvitz1, M Baum5.   

Abstract

The superiority of day 5 blastocysts compared to day 6 blastocysts in fresh cycle transfers was previously demonstrated and attributed mainly to endometrial asynchrony. Data from frozen blastocysts transfers showed conflicting results, possibly due to heterogeneous patient population and embryo quality. The aim of this study was to compare clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) between transfers of vitrified day 5 blastocysts and day 6 blastocysts in oocyte donation, blastocyst-only cycles. In a retrospective, multi-center study, with a single oocyte donation program, a total of 1840 frozen embryo transfers (FET's) were analyzed, including 1180 day 5 blastocysts and 660 day 6 blastocysts transfers. Day 5 blastocyst transfers had better embryonic development and significantly higher CPRs (34.24% vs. 20.15%, P < 0.0001), higher LBRs (26.89% vs. 14.77%, P < 0.0001), less cycles to LBR (1.83 ± 0.08 vs. 2.39 ± 0.18, P = 0.003) and shorter time to LBRs (76.32 ± 8.7 vs. 123.24 ± 19.1 days, P = 0.01), compared to day 6 transfers, respectively. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression indicated, that day 5 transfer was an independent factor for CPRs (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.43-2.54, P < 0.001) and LBRs (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.19-4.28, P = 0.01), regardless of embryo quality, compared to day 6. In conclusion, day 5 blastocysts in oocyte donation program have significantly higher CPRs and LBRs, and present shorter time to delivery, compared to day 6 blastocysts, regardless of embryo quality.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34021226     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90238-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  20 in total

1.  Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers.

Authors:  Gorka Barrenetxea; Arantza López de Larruzea; Teresa Ganzabal; Rosario Jiménez; Koldo Carbonero; Miren Mandiola
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Authors:  Alice Tubbing; Chloë Shaw-Jackson; Lieveke Ameye; Jérôme Colin; Serge Rozenberg; Candice Autin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Pregnancy outcomes after day 5 versus day 6 blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Xin Li; Jin Wang; Tian-Ze Sun; Mo-Qi Lv; Pan Ge; Hao-Nan Li; Dang-Xia Zhou
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Athanasios Siozos; Virginia Noelle Bolton; Yakoub Khalaf; Peter Riven Braude; Tarek El-Toukhy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer cycles.

Authors:  T El-Toukhy; E Wharf; R Walavalkar; A Singh; V Bolton; Y Khalaf; P Braude
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Elective embryo transfers on Day 6 reduce implantation compared with transfers on Day 5.

Authors:  V Poulsen; H J Ingerslev; K Kirkegaard
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.

Authors:  Lucile Ferreux; Mathilde Bourdon; Amira Sallem; Pietro Santulli; Virginie Barraud-Lange; Nathalie Le Foll; Chloé Maignien; Charles Chapron; Dominique de Ziegler; Jean-Philippe Wolf; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Ryan J Heitmann; Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Alan H DeCherney; Eric A Widra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Hongyi Yang; Qingling Yang; Shanjun Dai; Gang Li; Haixia Jin; Guidong Yao; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.357

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?

Authors:  Krzysztof Lukaszuk; Amira Podolak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Analysis of Biochemical and Clinical Pregnancy Loss Between Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer of Blastocysts and Day 3 Cleavage Embryos in Young Women: A Comprehensive Comparison.

Authors:  Xiuliang Dai; Tingting Gao; Xiyang Xia; Fang Cao; Chunmei Yu; Tianfu Li; Lingjun Li; Yufeng Wang; Li Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.555

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.