Literature DB >> 27091320

Oropharyngeal pH Testing Does Not Predict Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Laryngeal Symptoms.

Rena Yadlapati1, John E Pandolfino1, Alcina K Lidder2, Nadine Shabeeb3, Diana-Marie Jaiyeola1, Christopher Adkins1, Neelima Agrawal1, Andrew Cooper1, Caroline P E Price4, Jody D Ciolino1, Andrew J Gawron5, Stephanie S Smith4, Michiel Bove4, Bruce K Tan4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Predicting response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with laryngeal symptoms is challenging. The Restech Dx-pH probe is a transnasal catheter that measures oropharyngeal pH. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic potential of oropharyngeal pH monitoring to predict responsiveness to PPI therapy in patients with laryngeal symptoms.
METHODS: We conducted a physician-blinded prospective cohort study at a single academic institution between January 2013 and October 2014. Adult patients with Reflux Symptom Index scores (RSI) ≥13 off PPI therapy were recruited. Patients underwent video laryngoscopy and 24-h oropharyngeal pH monitoring, followed by an 8- to 12-week trial of omeprazole 40 mg daily. Prior to and following PPI therapy, patients completed various symptom questionnaires. The primary outcome was the association between PPI response and oropharyngeal pH metrics. PPI response was separated into three subgroups based on the post-treatment RSI score and % RSI response: non-response=RSI ≥13; partial response=post-treatment RSI <13 and change in RSI <50%; and complete response=post-treatment RSI <13 and change in RSI ≥50%. The primary analysis utilized a multinomial logistic regression controlling for the pre-treatment RSI score. A secondary analysis assessed the relationship between the change in RSI (post-pre) and oropharyngeal pH metrics via ordinary least square regression.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients completed the study and were included in final analysis. Symptom response to PPI therapy was as follows: 50% no response, 15% partial response, and 35% complete response. Non-responders had a higher pre-treatment RSI (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in oropharyngeal acid exposure (below pH of 4.0, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, and RYAN scores) between responder types. The secondary analysis noted a trend between lower PPI response and a greater total percent time below pH of 5.0 (P=0.03), upright percent time below pH of 5.0 (P=0.07), and RYAN supine (corrected; P=0.03), as well as an association between PPI response and greater decreases in the Anxiety Sensitivity Inventory (P<0.01), Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (P<0.01), and Negative Affect Scale (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Oropharyngeal pH testing did not predict laryngeal symptom response to PPI therapy. Contrary to hypothesis, our study signaled that the degree of oropharyngeal acid exposure is inversely related to PPI response. In addition, reduction in negative affect and psychological distress parallels PPI response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27091320      PMCID: PMC5071144          DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  40 in total

1.  Discomfort intolerance: Development of a construct and measure relevant to panic disorder.

Authors:  Norman B Schmidt; J Anthony Richey; Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2006

2.  The central role of gastrointestinal-specific anxiety in irritable bowel syndrome: further validation of the visceral sensitivity index.

Authors:  Jennifer S Labus; Emeran A Mayer; Lin Chang; Roger Bolus; Bruce D Naliboff
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  First agreement analysis and day-to-day comparison of pharyngeal pH monitoring with pH/impedance monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Valentin Becker; Simone Graf; Christoph Schlag; Tibor Schuster; Hubertus Feussner; Roland M Schmid; Monther Bajbouj
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The Reliability of the Reflux Finding Score Among General Otolaryngologists.

Authors:  Brent A Chang; S Danielle MacNeil; Murray D Morrison; Patricia K Lee
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Diagnosis of supra-esophageal gastric reflux: correlation of oropharyngeal pH with esophageal impedance monitoring for gastro-esophageal reflux.

Authors:  E Chiou; R Rosen; H Jiang; S Nurko
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  An oropharyngeal pH monitoring device to evaluate patients with chronic laryngitis.

Authors:  E S Yuksel; J C Slaughter; N Mukhtar; M Ochieng; G Sun; M Goutte; S Muddana; C Gaelyn Garrett; M F Vaezi
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Histologic versus pH probe results in pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Thomas M Andrews; Nicklas Orobello
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for laryngopharyngeal reflux: is it a reliable test before therapy?

Authors:  Cristian Vailati; Giorgia Mazzoleni; Stefano Bondi; Mario Bussi; Pier Alberto Testoni; Sandro Passaretti
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care.

Authors:  R Jones; O Junghard; J Dent; N Vakil; K Halling; B Wernersson; T Lind
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Development of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: a new tool for psychosomatic research.

Authors:  S Levenstein; C Prantera; V Varvo; M L Scribano; E Berto; C Luzi; A Andreoli
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.006

View more
  14 in total

1.  Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and autonomic nerve dysfunction.

Authors:  A Min Wang; Gang Wang; Ning Huang; Yan Yan Zheng; Fan Yang; Xia Qiu; Xian Ming Chen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Editorial: Reflux and Laryngeal Symptoms: A Sea of Confusion.

Authors:  Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Why differences between New York and New Delhi matter in approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Benjamin D Rogers; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10

5.  Response to Song et al.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; John E Pandolfino; Bruce K Tan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  The Quality of Care for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Lara Dakhoul; John E Pandolfino; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Philip O Katz; Kerry B Dunbar; Felice H Schnoll-Sussman; Katarina B Greer; Rena Yadlapati; Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Impact of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Outcome of Anti-Helicobacter pylori Therapy in Patients with Reflux Laryngopharyngitis.

Authors:  Huili Shen; Yijie Chen; Xiaohui Li; Jing Yan; Junjie Zhao; Demin Kong; Yanxia Shi; Zhihui Li; Jihong Wang; Na Shao; Zhenghui Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

Review 10.  Wireless 24, 48, and 96 Hour or Impedance or Oropharyngeal Prolonged pH Monitoring: Which Test, When, and Why for GERD?

Authors:  Soojong Chae; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.