Thomas M Andrews1, Nicklas Orobello. 1. All Children's Hospital/Johns Hopkins Medicine, St. Petersburg, FL, United States. tandrews@pohns.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A comparison of histologic findings from the post-cricoid region versus nasopharyngeal pH probe results in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in the pediatric patient. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Outpatient pediatric otolaryngology private practice. SUBJECT AND METHODS: 63 consecutive patients, age 6-months to 17-years between June 1, 2009 and October 6, 2010, tested by simultaneous post cricoid biopsy and nasopharyngeal pH probe monitoring using the Restech Dx-pH Measurement System (Respiratory Technology Corporation, San Diego, CA). RESULTS: Of the 63 total patients (age 6-months to 17-years), 11 (17%) were excluded due to a pulled probe, one additional patient did not have a biopsy taken and one probe failed after insertion making a total of 50 patients with complete data sets. Thirty-six of those 50 patients had a positive probe with a negative biopsy (72%). Four (8%) had both a positive probe and biopsy and 10 (16%) had a negative probe and negative biopsy. No patients had a negative probe and positive biopsy. Symptoms used to identify patients suspected of reflux included: throat clearing, nasal congestion, cough, history of recurrent sinusitis with negative radiographic findings, halitosis, culture negative sore throat, post nasal drip, otalgia, poor appetite and stomach ache. CONCLUSION: Eighty percent of our patients (40) were either positive for reflux by pH probe or by pH probe and biopsy. The Restech Dx-pH Measurement System appeared to be well tolerated in all age groups. There were no complications. We found this a useful tool in confirming clinical suspicion of LPR.
OBJECTIVE: A comparison of histologic findings from the post-cricoid region versus nasopharyngeal pH probe results in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in the pediatric patient. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING:Outpatient pediatric otolaryngology private practice. SUBJECT AND METHODS: 63 consecutive patients, age 6-months to 17-years between June 1, 2009 and October 6, 2010, tested by simultaneous post cricoid biopsy and nasopharyngeal pH probe monitoring using the Restech Dx-pH Measurement System (Respiratory Technology Corporation, San Diego, CA). RESULTS: Of the 63 total patients (age 6-months to 17-years), 11 (17%) were excluded due to a pulled probe, one additional patient did not have a biopsy taken and one probe failed after insertion making a total of 50 patients with complete data sets. Thirty-six of those 50 patients had a positive probe with a negative biopsy (72%). Four (8%) had both a positive probe and biopsy and 10 (16%) had a negative probe and negative biopsy. No patients had a negative probe and positive biopsy. Symptoms used to identify patients suspected of reflux included: throat clearing, nasal congestion, cough, history of recurrent sinusitis with negative radiographic findings, halitosis, culture negative sore throat, post nasal drip, otalgia, poor appetite and stomach ache. CONCLUSION: Eighty percent of our patients (40) were either positive for reflux by pH probe or by pH probe and biopsy. The Restech Dx-pH Measurement System appeared to be well tolerated in all age groups. There were no complications. We found this a useful tool in confirming clinical suspicion of LPR.
Authors: Rena Yadlapati; John E Pandolfino; Alcina K Lidder; Nadine Shabeeb; Diana-Marie Jaiyeola; Christopher Adkins; Neelima Agrawal; Andrew Cooper; Caroline P E Price; Jody D Ciolino; Andrew J Gawron; Stephanie S Smith; Michiel Bove; Bruce K Tan Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 10.864