Literature DB >> 21592256

Diagnosis of supra-esophageal gastric reflux: correlation of oropharyngeal pH with esophageal impedance monitoring for gastro-esophageal reflux.

E Chiou1, R Rosen, H Jiang, S Nurko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal (OP) pH monitoring has been developed as a new way to diagnose supra-esophageal gastric reflux (SEGR), but has not been well validated. Our aim was to determine the correlation between OP pH and gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) events detected by multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH).
METHODS: Fifteen patients (11 males, median age 10.8 years) with suspected GER were prospectively evaluated with ambulatory 24-h OP pH monitoring (positioned at the level of the uvula) and concomitant esophageal MII-pH monitoring. Potential OP events were identified by the conventional pH threshold of <4 and by the following alternative criteria: (i) relative pH drop >10% from 15-min baseline and (ii) absolute pH drop below thresholds of <5.5, 5.0, and 4.5. The 2-min window preceding each OP event was analyzed for correlation with an episode of GER detected by MII-pH. KEY
RESULTS: A total of 926 GER events were detected by MII-pH. Application of alternative pH criteria increased the identification of potential OP pH events; however, a higher proportion of OP events had no temporal correlation with GER (45-81%), compared with the conventional definition of pH < 4 (40%). A total of 306 full-column acid reflux episodes were detected by MII-pH, of which 10 (3.3%) were also identified by OP pH monitoring. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Use of extended pH criteria increased the detection of potential SEGR events, but the majority of decreases in OP pH were not temporally correlated with GER. Oropharyngeal pH monitoring without concurrent esophageal measurements may overestimate the presence of SEGR in children.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592256      PMCID: PMC3139023          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01726.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  36 in total

1.  Comparison of an oropharyngeal pH probe and a standard dual pH probe for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Justin S Golub; Michael M Johns; Jae H Lim; John M DelGaudio; Adam M Klein
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Normal values for pharyngeal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Neil N Chheda; Melanie W Seybt; Robert R Schade; Gregory N Postma
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 3.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux and aspiration in patients with advanced lung disease.

Authors:  M P Sweet; M G Patti; C Hoopes; S R Hays; J A Golden
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Regional oesophageal sensitivity to acid and weakly acidic reflux in patients with non-erosive reflux disease.

Authors:  S Emerenziani; M Ribolsi; D Sifrim; K Blondeau; M Cicala
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Exclusion of pH artifacts is essential for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Steven P Harrell; Jennifer Koopman; Scheryl Woosley; John M Wo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related airway disorder.

Authors:  J A Kaufman; J E Houghland; E Quiroga; M Cahill; C A Pellegrini; B K Oelschlager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Systematic review: the extra-oesophageal symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children.

Authors:  V Tolia; Y Vandenplas
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Characteristics of symptomatic reflux episodes on Acid suppressive therapy.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Elizabeth G Hill; Inder Mainie; Amit Agrawal; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Role of acid and nonacid reflux in children with eosinophilic esophagitis compared with patients with gastroesophageal reflux and control patients.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen; Glenn Furuta; Julia Fritz; Kate Donovan; Samuel Nurko
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.839

10.  Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring.

Authors:  I Mainie; R Tutuian; S Shay; M Vela; X Zhang; D Sifrim; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Oropharyngeal Reflux Monitoring and Atypical Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Ali H Harb; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-03

2.  Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Functional Laryngeal Disorder: Perspective and Common Practice of the General Gastroenterologist.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Michael Blanco; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-09

3.  Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Martin Duricek; Peter Banovcin; Tatiana Halickova; Rudolf Hyrdel; Marian Kollarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Philip O Katz; Kerry B Dunbar; Felice H Schnoll-Sussman; Katarina B Greer; Rena Yadlapati; Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

6.  Oropharyngeal pH Testing Does Not Predict Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Laryngeal Symptoms.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; John E Pandolfino; Alcina K Lidder; Nadine Shabeeb; Diana-Marie Jaiyeola; Christopher Adkins; Neelima Agrawal; Andrew Cooper; Caroline P E Price; Jody D Ciolino; Andrew J Gawron; Stephanie S Smith; Michiel Bove; Bruce K Tan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Wireless 24, 48, and 96 Hour or Impedance or Oropharyngeal Prolonged pH Monitoring: Which Test, When, and Why for GERD?

Authors:  Soojong Chae; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26

8.  Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen; Yvan Vandenplas; Maartje Singendonk; Michael Cabana; Carlo DiLorenzo; Frederic Gottrand; Sandeep Gupta; Miranda Langendam; Annamaria Staiano; Nikhil Thapar; Neelesh Tipnis; Merit Tabbers
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Risk Factors for Bile Aspiration and its Impact on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen; Margot Lurie; Madeline Kane; Courtney DiFilippo; Alexandra Cohen; Dawn Freiberger; Debra Boyer; Gary Visner; Monica Narvaez-Rivas; Enju Liu; Kenneth Setchell
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Correlation between the different pH-metry scores in gastroesophageal reflux disease in children.

Authors:  Vasile Valeriu Lupu; Ancuţa Ignat; Gabriela Paduraru; Anamaria Ciubara; Mihaela Moscalu; Cristina Oana Marginean; Marin Burlea
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.