Jennifer S Labus1, Emeran A Mayer, Lin Chang, Roger Bolus, Bruce D Naliboff. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Center for Neurovisceral Sciences and Women's Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. jlabus@ucla.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Visceral Sensitivity Index (VSI) was developed as the first instrument to assess gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, the cognitive, affective, and behavioral response to fear of gastrointestinal sensations, symptoms, and the context in which these visceral sensations and symptoms occur. The purpose of the current study was to a) replicate the previously reported psychometric properties of the VSI, b) assess the known-groups and concurrent validity of the instrument, and c) test conceptual hypotheses regarding gastrointestinal-specific anxiety in comparison to other general measures of psychological distress as a crucial mechanism (mediator/moderator) underlying irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis and its symptoms. METHODS: Two undergraduate student samples (n > 500) were administered the VSI along with measures assessing presence of lower gastrointestinal symptoms, nongastrointestinal pain, health-service utilization, anxiety, depression, vitality, neuroticism, and anxiety sensitivity. Path analyses tested the hypothesis that gastrointestinal-specific anxiety mediates the relationship between affective variables and irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis and symptoms. A 'known-groups' validity approach elucidated the relevance of gastrointestinal-specific anxiety across a spectrum of irritable bowel syndrome patients. RESULTS: Good concurrent, divergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated. Logistic regression revealed that gastrointestinal-specific anxiety is the key explanatory variable of irritable bowel syndrome diagnostic status. Path analysis demonstrated that gastrointestinal-specific anxiety mediates the relationship between general psychological distress measures and gastrointestinal symptom severity. The VSI was related to gastrointestinal, but not nongastrointestinal, symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the VSI demonstrated excellent psychometric properties providing further support for its use in mechanistic studies of the role of anxiety in irritable bowel syndrome presentation.
OBJECTIVES: The Visceral Sensitivity Index (VSI) was developed as the first instrument to assess gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, the cognitive, affective, and behavioral response to fear of gastrointestinal sensations, symptoms, and the context in which these visceral sensations and symptoms occur. The purpose of the current study was to a) replicate the previously reported psychometric properties of the VSI, b) assess the known-groups and concurrent validity of the instrument, and c) test conceptual hypotheses regarding gastrointestinal-specific anxiety in comparison to other general measures of psychological distress as a crucial mechanism (mediator/moderator) underlying irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis and its symptoms. METHODS: Two undergraduate student samples (n > 500) were administered the VSI along with measures assessing presence of lower gastrointestinal symptoms, nongastrointestinal pain, health-service utilization, anxiety, depression, vitality, neuroticism, and anxiety sensitivity. Path analyses tested the hypothesis that gastrointestinal-specific anxiety mediates the relationship between affective variables and irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis and symptoms. A 'known-groups' validity approach elucidated the relevance of gastrointestinal-specific anxiety across a spectrum of irritable bowel syndromepatients. RESULTS: Good concurrent, divergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated. Logistic regression revealed that gastrointestinal-specific anxiety is the key explanatory variable of irritable bowel syndrome diagnostic status. Path analysis demonstrated that gastrointestinal-specific anxiety mediates the relationship between general psychological distress measures and gastrointestinal symptom severity. The VSI was related to gastrointestinal, but not nongastrointestinal, symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the VSI demonstrated excellent psychometric properties providing further support for its use in mechanistic studies of the role of anxiety in irritable bowel syndrome presentation.
Authors: Jennifer S Labus; Bruce D Naliboff; Steve M Berman; Brandall Suyenobu; Eduardo P Vianna; Kirsten Tillisch; Emeran A Mayer Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Puja Khanna; Nikhil Agarwal; Dinesh Khanna; Ron D Hays; Lin Chang; Roger Bolus; Gil Melmed; Cynthia B Whitman; Robert M Kaplan; Rikke Ogawa; Bradley Snyder; Brennan Mr Spiegel Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Brennan Spiegel; Michael Camilleri; Roger Bolus; Viola Andresen; William D Chey; Sheri Fehnel; Allen Mangel; Nicholas J Talley; William E Whitehead Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-08-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Brennan M R Spiegel; Dinesh Khanna; Roger Bolus; Nikhil Agarwal; Puja Khanna; Lin Chang Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: A Patel; S Hasak; B Cassell; M A Ciorba; E E Vivio; M Kumar; C Prakash Gyawali; G S Sayuk Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Michelle G Craske; Kate B Wolitzky-Taylor; Jennifer Labus; Stephen Wu; Michael Frese; Emeran A Mayer; Bruce D Naliboff Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2011-04-19
Authors: Erica Cohen; Roger Bolus; Dinesh Khanna; Ron D Hays; Lin Chang; Gil Y Melmed; Puja Khanna; Brennan Spiegel Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: J S Labus; B N Naliboff; J Fallon; S M Berman; B Suyenobu; J A Bueller; M Mandelkern; E A Mayer Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Christian Twiss; Lisa Kilpatrick; Michelle Craske; C A Tony Buffington; Edward Ornitz; Larissa V Rodríguez; Emeran A Mayer; Bruce D Naliboff Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 7.450