Literature DB >> 27072148

Comparison of intraocular pressure variability in glaucoma measured by multiple clinicians with those by one clinician.

Motofumi Kawai1, Naoko Kawai2, Seigo Nakabayashi2, Reiko Kinouchi2, Akitoshi Yoshida2.   

Abstract

To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) variability measured by multiple clinicians with those by one clinician. Forty-seven of 227 consecutive patients with glaucoma who had been examined routinely for over 12 months without changes in antiglaucoma medications at Asahikawa Medical University were included. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on whether they had been followed by multiple or one clinician. One eye of each patient was evaluated. The IOPs obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry were evaluated. We used the IOP standard deviation (SD, mmHg) and coefficient of variation (CV, %) as parameters of IOP variability. The main outcome measures were the differences in SD and CV between the groups. Multiple linear regression analysis evaluated factors associated with the SD and CV. Twenty-four (51.1 %) patients were assigned to the multiple-clinicians group and 23 (48.9 %) to the single-clinician group. The mean ± SD and CV were higher in the former (1.9 ± 0.5 and 12.0 ± 3.7, respectively) than in the latter group (1.4 ± 0.3 and 10.1 ± 2.5; P = 0.0005 and 0.044, respectively). The number of treating clinicians was the factor most associated with the SD and CV (β = 0.455, P = 0.002 and β = 0.387, P = 0.008, respectively). The variability in the IOP measurements of patients who had been monitored by multiple clinicians was higher than in patients followed by one clinician. The factor most associated with IOP variability was the number of clinicians involved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glaucoma; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Intraocular pressure; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27072148     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0217-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  21 in total

1.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Relationship between intraocular pressure and rate of visual field progression in treated glaucoma.

Authors:  Harsha L Rao; Uday K Addepalli; Ganesh B Jonnadula; Tukaram Kumbar; Sirisha Senthil; Chandra S Garudadri
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Sarwat Salim; Haiming Du; Jim Wan
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry.

Authors:  H H Mark
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 6.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 7.  Collaborative normal tension glaucoma study.

Authors:  Douglas R Anderson
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.

Authors:  Anders Heijl; M Cristina Leske; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Boel Bengtsson; Mohamed Hussein
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10

9.  Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.

Authors:  Joseph Caprioli; Anne L Coleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Repeatability and reproducibility of Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.

Authors:  Allen Shawlun Wang; Luciana M Alencar; Robert N Weinreb; Ali Tafreshi; Sunil Deokule; Gianmarco Vizzeri; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ocular biometric parameters are associated with non-contact tonometry measured intraocular pressure in non-pathologic myopic patients.

Authors:  Yazhen Ma; Yanping Ma; Chenli Feng; Minqian Shen; Yuanzhi Yuan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Continuous 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) using a novel contact lens sensor: Comparison with pneumatonometry.

Authors:  Kevin Gillmann; Robert Wasilewicz; Kirsten Hoskens; Sonja Simon-Zoula; Kaweh Mansouri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.