Literature DB >> 23542696

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.

Sarwat Salim1, Haiming Du, Jim Wan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goals of our study were to analyze the correlation of rebound tonometer (RBT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), assess the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of these tonometers, and investigate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements recorded with both tonometers in glaucoma patients under treatment.
METHODS: In a prospective study of 65 eyes with glaucoma, IOP was measured using RBT and GAT, followed by measurements of CCT.
RESULTS: A clear correlation between RBT and GAT was found (r=0.89, P<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of measurements by GAT and RBT of 2.45 mm Hg with 2 SD=4.24 mm Hg. Both tonometers were affected by CCT. High intraobserver correlation coefficients were found with both tonometers (0.981 and 0.979 for RBT for examiner 1 and examiner 2, respectively, and 0.989 for GAT for both examiners). Interobserver agreement appeared to be better with GAT when compared with RBT (variation coefficients were 4.6% for GAT and 7.1% for RBT).
CONCLUSIONS: RBT may have a potential role and use in routine evaluation and management of glaucoma patients given its high correlation with GAT and high reproducibility in IOP measurements. As with GAT, measurements obtained with RBT are affected by CCT, reinforcing the role of pachymetry in glaucoma management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542696     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318237caa2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Nilgün Yildirim; Afsun Şahin; Ertuğrul Çolak
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Intraocular pressure and wound state immediately after long versus short clear corneal incision cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Hiroshi Sasaki; Shin-Ichi Manabe; Akira Hirata
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Does patient comfort influence the choice of tonometer for the measurement of intraocular pressure?

Authors:  Mary O Ugalahi; Mukaila A Seidu; Bolutife A Olusanya; Aderonke M Baiyeroju
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Effectiveness of the ICare rebound tonometer in patients with overestimated intraocular pressure due to tight orbit syndrome.

Authors:  You Kyung Lee; Y K Lee; Ji Young Lee; J Y Lee; Jung Il Moon; J I Moon; Myoung Hee Park; M H Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Influence of holding weights of different magnitudes on intraocular pressure and anterior eye biometrics.

Authors:  Jesús Vera; Beatríz Redondo; Rubén Molina; Amador Garcia-Ramos; Raimundo Jiménez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Measurement of Intraocular Pressure by Patients With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Savva Pronin; Lyndsay Brown; Roly Megaw; Andrew J Tatham
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Comparison of intraocular pressure variability in glaucoma measured by multiple clinicians with those by one clinician.

Authors:  Motofumi Kawai; Naoko Kawai; Seigo Nakabayashi; Reiko Kinouchi; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Wound stability and surgically induced corneal astigmatism after transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal incision cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Soichiro Ogawa; Motoaki Yoshida; Koichi Yoshimura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Repeatability and reproducibility of applanation resonance tonometry: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Laura Ottobelli; Paolo Fogagnolo; Paolo Frezzotti; Stefano De Cillà; Elena Vallenzasca; Maurizio Digiuni; Ruggiero Paderni; Ilaria Motolese; Simone Alex Bagaglia; Eduardo Motolese; Luca Rossetti
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Comprasion of ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in high myopia.

Authors:  Halil Huseyin Cagatay; Metin Ekinci; Zeliha Yazar; Gokcen Gokce; Erdinc Ceylan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.