Literature DB >> 27023713

Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement.

Igor Sorokin1, Diana K Cardona-Grau2, Alexandra Rehfuss2, Alan Birney3, Costas Stavrakis3, Gabriel Leinwand2, Allen Herr3, Paul J Feustel4, Mark D White2,5.   

Abstract

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is highly successful at eliminating renal stones of various sizes and compositions. As urologists are taking on more complex procedures using RIRS, this has led to an increase in operative (OR) times. Our objective was to determine the best predictor of OR time in patients undergoing RIRS. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients undergoing unilateral RIRS for solitary stones over a 10 year time span. Stones were fragmented and actively extracted using a basket. Variables potentially affecting OR time such as patient age, sex, BMI, lower pole stone location, volume, Hounsfield units (HU), composition, ureteral access sheath (UAS) use, and pre-operative stenting were collected. Multivariable linear and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the predictors of OR time. There were 118 patients that met inclusion criteria. The median stone volume was 282.6 mm3 (IQR 150.7-644.7) and the mean OR time was 50 min (±25.9 SD). On univariate linear regression, stone volume had a moderate correlation with OR time (y = 0.022x + 38.2, r 2 = 0.363, p < 0.01). On multivariable stepwise regression, stone volume had the strongest impact on OR time, increasing time by 2.0 min for each 100 mm3 increase in stone volume (p < 0.001). UAS added 13.5 (SE 3.9, p = 0.001) minutes and renal lower pole location added 9 min (SE 4.3, p = 0.03) in each case they were used. Pre-operative stenting, HU, calcium oxalate stone composition, sex, and age had no significant effect on OR time. Amongst the main stone factors in RIRS, stone volume has the strongest impact on operative time. This can be used to predict the length of the procedure by roughly adding 2 min per 100 mm3 increase in stone volume.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Operative time; Renal stones; Stone volume; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27023713     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0875-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  17 in total

1.  Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement.

Authors:  Sutchin R Patel; Paul Stanton; Nathan Zelinski; Edward J Borman; Myron A Pozniak; Stephen Y Nakada; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Lei Chu; Kevan M Sternberg; Timothy D Averch
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy D Jackson; Jeffrey J Wannares; R Todd Lancaster; David W Rattner; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy?

Authors:  J Kourambas; R R Byrne; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Avinash Kambadakone; Manoj Monga; James K Anderson; Andrew A Thoreson; Hang Lee; Stephen P Dretler; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis.

Authors:  John M Shields; Vincent G Bird; Reid Graves; Orlando Gómez-Marín
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Effect of stone composition on operative time during ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy with active fragment retrieval.

Authors:  Scott V Wiener; Levi A Deters; Vernon M Pais
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Clinical predictors of operative complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study.

Authors:  Eric D Jenkins; Victoria H Yom; Lora Melman; Richard A Pierce; Richard B Schuessler; Margaret M Frisella; J Christopher Eagon; L Michael Brunt; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  13 in total

1.  Differentiation of ureteral stones and phleboliths using Hounsfield units on computerized tomography: a new method without observer bias.

Authors:  Yiloren Tanidir; Ahmet Sahan; Mehmet Kazim Asutay; Tarik Emre Sener; Farhad Talibzade; Asgar Garayev; Ilker Tinay; Cagri Akin Sekerci; Ferruh Simsek
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jenni Lane; Lily Whitehurst; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Theodoros Tokas; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  CT-calculometry (CT-CM): advanced NCCT post-processing to investigate urinary calculi.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Patrick Betschart; Lukas Hechelhammer; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Factors Predicting Operating Room Time in Ureteroscopy and Ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Ioannis Katafigiotis; Itay M Sabler; Eliyahu M Heifetz; Ayman Isid; Stavros Sfoungaristos; Amitay Lorber; Vladimir Yutkin; Guy Hidas; Arie Latke; Ezekiel H Landau; Dov Pode; Ofer N Gofrit; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-07-20

5.  Factors affecting the operating time for complete cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in paediatric cases of congenital choledochal malformation: a retrospective case study in Southeast China.

Authors:  Shun-Gen Huang; Jian Wang; Wan-Liang Guo; Yang Zhan; Fang Fang; Yan-Bing Deng; Jun-Gang Zhao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Factors affecting operative time during ureteroscopy and stone treatment and its effect on outcomes: retrospective results over 6.5 years.

Authors:  Lily Whitehurst; Amelia Pietropaolo; Robert Geraghty; Rena Kyriakides; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2020-06-23

7.  Evaluation of stone volume and its relationship with surgical outcomes in patients with staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Abhirudra Mulay; Vikram Satav; Ashwani Kandari; Sonu Sharma; Deepak Mane; Vilas Sabale
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

8.  Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements.

Authors:  Alexandre Danilovic; Bruno Aragão Rocha; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Olivier Traxer; Carlos Batagello; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Fábio César Miranda Torricelli; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Nomogram to predict postoperative infectious complications after surgery for colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study in China.

Authors:  Jing Wen; Tao Pan; Yun-Chuan Yuan; Qiu-Shi Huang; Jian Shen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Risk factors of infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a retrospective clinical analysis.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Tao Jiang; Rui Gao; Qin Chen; Weiwen Chen; Changyi Liu; Houping Mao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.