Literature DB >> 26044831

Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis.

Hiroki Ito1,2, Shinnosuke Kuroda3, Takashi Kawahara3, Kazuhide Makiyama4, Masahiro Yao4, Junichi Matsuzaki3.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical factors affecting the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). We retrospectively evaluated 233 patients with renal stones who had been treated successfully and had stone-free status 3 months after fURS and holmium laser lithotripsy between December 2009 and December 2013 at a single institute. Operative time was divided into three periods (total, before fragmentation, and after starting fragmentation), and associations between possible factors and these periods were analyzed by a multivariate logistic regression model with backward selection. The mean total operative time was 74.0 ± 32.0 min. There were significant differences in the following clinical factors: sex, body height, stone volume, maximum and mean Hounsfield units (HUs), diameter of the ureteral access sheath, and experience of the surgeon, between patients who underwent procedures with a total operative time of less or more than 90 min. A multivariate assessment revealed four independent factors influencing total operative time (P < 0.05): stone volume (P < 0.001), experience of the surgeon (P < 0.001), maximum HUs (P = 0.014), and lack of preoperative stenting (P = 0.027). Larger stone volume, lower experience level of the surgeon, higher HUs, and the absence of preoperative stenting were identified as parameters prolonging the total operative time of fURS and, in particular, the operative time after starting fragmentation. On the other hand, operative time before starting fragmentation, which represented the time required to identify the stone by ureteroscopy and insert the access sheath, was more difficult to predict preoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney stone; Lithotripsy; Operative time; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26044831     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0789-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  27 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar M Aboumarzouk; Manoj Monga; Slawomir G Kata; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Variables that influence operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1897 cases.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Muzaffer Akcay; Erdem Tekinarslan; Cem Kezer; Faruk Ozgor; Mahir Seyrek; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Longer operative time is associated with higher risk of severe complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: analysis of 1511 cases from a Japanese nationwide database.

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Tetsuya Fujimura; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Haruki Kume; Kazuhiko Ohe; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Yukio Homma
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  Factors affecting operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience with the complete supine position.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Ahmad Enshaei; Ahmad Asadollahzade; Alireza Farzan; Reza Shahrokhi Damavand; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Somayeh Khodabakhsh; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  A nomogram predicting severe adverse events after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: 12  372 patients in a Japanese national series.

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Haruki Kume; Kazuhiko Ohe; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Yukio Homma
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier?

Authors:  Alberto Breda; Oreoluwa Ogunyemi; John T Leppert; John S Lam; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Kentaro Sakamaki; Takashi Kawahara; Hideyuki Terao; Kengo Yasuda; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Yao; Yoshinobu Kubota; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients.

Authors:  Christopher Netsch; Sophie Knipper; Thorsten Bach; Thomas R W Herrmann; Andreas J Gross
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  7 in total

1.  Single session vs two sessions of flexible ureterosopy (FURS) for dusting of renal pelvic stones 2-3 cm in diameter: Does stone size or hardness play a role in number of sessions to be applied?"

Authors:  Ahmed Mamdouh Abd El Hamed; Hazem Elmoghazy; Mohamed Aldahshoury; Ahmed Riad; Mohammed Mostafa; Fawzy Farag; Wael Gamal
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

Review 2.  Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jenni Lane; Lily Whitehurst; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Theodoros Tokas; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Felipe Pauchard; Antonio Rebello Horta Gorgen; Frédéric Panthier; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Diana K Cardona-Grau; Alexandra Rehfuss; Alan Birney; Costas Stavrakis; Gabriel Leinwand; Allen Herr; Paul J Feustel; Mark D White
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Factors Predicting Operating Room Time in Ureteroscopy and Ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Ioannis Katafigiotis; Itay M Sabler; Eliyahu M Heifetz; Ayman Isid; Stavros Sfoungaristos; Amitay Lorber; Vladimir Yutkin; Guy Hidas; Arie Latke; Ezekiel H Landau; Dov Pode; Ofer N Gofrit; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-07-20

6.  A new prediction model for operative time of flexible ureteroscopy with lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones.

Authors:  Shinnosuke Kuroda; Hiroki Ito; Kentaro Sakamaki; Tadashi Tabei; Takashi Kawahara; Atsushi Fujikawa; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Hiroji Uemura; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spinal versus general anesthesia during retrograde intra-renal surgery: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Olivero; Lorenzo Ball; Carlotta Fontaneto; Guglielmo Mantica; Paolo Bottino; Paolo Pelosi; Carlo Terrone
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-04-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.