Literature DB >> 28948344

CT-calculometry (CT-CM): advanced NCCT post-processing to investigate urinary calculi.

Valentin Zumstein1, Patrick Betschart2, Lukas Hechelhammer3, Hans-Peter Schmid2, Dominik Abt2, Magdalena Müller-Gerbl4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed at evaluating the potential of CT-calculometry (CT-CM) as a novel method to determine mineralisation, composition, homogeneity and volume of urinary calculi based on preoperative non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) scans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT-CM was performed in preoperative NCCTs of 25 patients treated for upper tract urinary calculi by ureterorenoscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Absolute mineralisation values were achieved by use of quantitative CT-osteoabsorptiometry and compared to Fourier infrared spectroscopy as a reference for stone composition. Homogeneity was assessed by advanced software-based NCCT post-processing and visualised by using a maximum intensity projection algorithm. Volumetric measurement was performed by software-based three-dimensional reconstruction.
RESULTS: CT-CM was feasible in all of the 25 NCCTs. Absolute mineralisation values calculated by quantitative CT-OAM might be used to identify the most frequent stone types. High levels of inhomogeneity could be detected even in pure component stones. Volumetric measurement could be performed with minimal effort.
CONCLUSIONS: CT-CM is based on advanced NCCT post-processing software and represents a novel and promising approach to determine mineralisation, composition, homogeneity and volume of urinary calculi based on preoperative NCCT. CT-CM could provide valuable information to predict outcome of different stone treatment methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT-calculometry (CT-CM); CT-osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM); Composition; Homogeneity; Mineralisation; Urinary calculi

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28948344     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2092-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  21 in total

Review 1.  The subchondral bone plate.

Authors:  M Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.231

2.  Mineralisation and mechanical strength of the glenoid cavity subchondral bone plate.

Authors:  Marko Kraljević; Valentin Zumstein; Dieter Wirz; Rolf Hügli; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Correlation between mineralization and mechanical strength of the subchondral bone plate of the humeral head.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Marko Kraljević; Dieter Wirz; Rolf Hügli; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  Idir Ouzaid; Said Al-qahtani; Sébastien Dominique; Vincent Hupertan; Pédro Fernandez; Jean-François Hermieu; Vincent Delmas; Vincent Ravery
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with x-ray diffraction.

Authors:  Guy Hidas; Ruth Eliahou; Mordechai Duvdevani; Phillipe Coulon; Laurent Lemaitre; Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Jacob Sosna
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Stone size limits the use of Hounsfield units for prediction of calcium oxalate stone composition.

Authors:  Gregory Stewart; Lewis Johnson; Halemane Ganesh; Daniel Davenport; Woodson Smelser; Paul Crispen; Ramakrishna Venkatesh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C Renner; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.847

8.  Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Diana K Cardona-Grau; Alexandra Rehfuss; Alan Birney; Costas Stavrakis; Gabriel Leinwand; Allen Herr; Paul J Feustel; Mark D White
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Gaurav Bandi; Ryan J Meiners; Perry J Pickhardt; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?

Authors:  Gautier Müllhaupt; Daniel S Engeler; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  1 in total

1.  Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Langenauer; P Betschart; L Hechelhammer; S Güsewell; H P Schmid; D S Engeler; D Abt; V Zumstein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.