Literature DB >> 22854140

Effect of stone composition on operative time during ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy with active fragment retrieval.

Scott V Wiener1, Levi A Deters, Vernon M Pais.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the stone composition affects the operative time of ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy (ULL) with active fragment retrieval. The chemical composition of a calculus is known to affect the efficacy with which it is fragmented by a device, such as pneumatic, laser, or shock wave lithotripter. Previous studies examining the efficacy of holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy have been performed in vitro, but it is not known whether the operative time is significantly affected by the chemical composition of a patient's stone.
METHODS: We selected all patients who had undergone ULL for stone disease from July 2008 to January 2011 for a retrospective chart review. We used a standardized operative technique of fragmentation and active retrieval of all fragments identified on full inspection of the entire collecting system using rigid and flexible endoscopes. The stone composition was defined as the presence of a single predominant (>51%) component. Statistical analysis was performed on a per-procedure basis relative to the stone burden, as measured in minutes of operative time per gram of stone.
RESULTS: A total of 187 cases of unilateral ULL with active retrieval of stone fragments confirmed to have a single predominant chemical composition met the inclusion criteria. When accounting for the weight of the recovered stone, no difference was found in the operative time among the apatite, brushite, cystine, calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, and uric acid stones.
CONCLUSION: Although stone composition is widely recognized as an important procedural variable, especially for shock wave lithotripsy, it appears to have little effect on the overall operative time for holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lithotripsy when using active fragment retrieval.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22854140     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm laser fibers in semirigid ureteroscopic Ho:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Vladimir Yutkin; Constantinos A Constantinides; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with horseshoe kidneys.

Authors:  Gokhan Atis; Berkan Resorlu; Cenk Gurbuz; Ozgur Arikan; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Ali Unsal; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Disposable devices for RIRS: where do we stand in 2013? What do we need in the future?

Authors:  Richard H Shin; Michael E Lipkin; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Felipe Pauchard; Antonio Rebello Horta Gorgen; Frédéric Panthier; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Previous shock-wave lithotripsy treatment does not impact the outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Emrah Yürük; Murat Binbay; Tolga Akman; Faruk Özgör; Yalçın Berberoğlu; Ahmet Yaser Müslümanoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12

6.  Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Diana K Cardona-Grau; Alexandra Rehfuss; Alan Birney; Costas Stavrakis; Gabriel Leinwand; Allen Herr; Paul J Feustel; Mark D White
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Outpatient Transurethral Cystolithotripsy of Large Bladder Stones by Holmium Laser.

Authors:  Hosein Karami; Mohammad Reza Razaghi; Babak Javanmard; Mohammad Yaghoob; Amin Hasanzadeh Hadad; Maryam Amani; Amin Golmohammadi Taklimi
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-07

Review 8.  Cystinuria-a urologist's perspective.

Authors:  Kay Thomas; Kathie Wong; John Withington; Matthew Bultitude; Angela Doherty
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Predicting stone composition before treatment - can it really drive clinical decisions?

Authors:  Ewa Bres-Niewada; Bartosz Dybowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-12-05

Review 10.  Cystinuria: An Overview of Challenges and Surgical Management.

Authors:  Calum Stephen Clark; Sanjith Gnanappiragasam; Kay Thomas; Matthew Bultitude
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.