Literature DB >> 21388240

Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy.

Lei Chu1, Kevan M Sternberg, Timothy D Averch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Large stone burden can be treated ureteroscopically, but the treatment often requires more than one procedure. Placement of a preoperative stent may theoretically enhance stone clearance by dilating the ureter to facilitate both access and stone removal. This study determines the impact of stent placement before ureteroscopy on operative time, radiologic stone clearance, and reoperative rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent ureteroscopic stone intervention at our institution from 2002 to 2008 by a single surgeon. Nonstented matched controls were used for comparison. Demographics, stone characteristics (size, number, density, and location), presence of preprocedural ureteral stent, operative time, and results of postoperative imaging were compared between the two cohorts. Statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS: There were 104 patients included in the study (45 prestented and 59 nonstented). Median stone size was 1 cm (range 0.3-4 cm). Overall stone clearance was 95.8%. The median number of procedures was one. Prestenting significantly reduced operative time during first ureteroscopy in patients with large stone requiring multiple ureteroscopies (p = 0.008) and total operative time to stone clearance in patients with stone >1 cm (p = 0.01), but not in patients with stone burdens <1 cm (p = 0.48). Prestenting also significantly reduced reoperative rates in patients with stone burden >1 cm (p = 0.001), especially for stones located in proximal ureter and kidney. Prestenting improves postoperative radiologic clearance, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: Results show that ureteroscopic lithotripsy of large stone burden can be performed with a high success rate. Preureteroscopic stent placement was associated with a decreased operative time and reoperative rates in patients with larger stone burdens of >1 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21388240     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  24 in total

1.  Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Preoperative double-J stent placement can improve the stone-free rate for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yubo Yang; Yin Tang; Yunjin Bai; Xiaoming Wang; Dechao Feng; Ping Han
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Role of pre-operative ureteral stent on outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS): systematic review and meta-analysis of 3831 patients and comparison of Asian and non-Asian cohorts.

Authors:  Y X T Law; J Y C Teoh; D Castellani; E J Lim; E O T Chan; M Wroclawski; G M Pirola; C Giulioni; E Rubilotta; M Gubbioti; S Scarcella; B H Chew; O Traxer; B K Somani; V Gauhar
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The use of 14/16Fr ureter access sheath for safe and effective management of large upper ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; George Kalogeropoulos; Marco Lattarulo; Constantinos Adamou; Konstantinos Pagonis; Angelis Peteinaris; Despoina Liourdi; Theofanis Vrettos; Evangelos Liatsikos; Panagiotis Kallidonis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Diana K Cardona-Grau; Alexandra Rehfuss; Alan Birney; Costas Stavrakis; Gabriel Leinwand; Allen Herr; Paul J Feustel; Mark D White
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Increasing the size of ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves surgical efficiency without increasing complications.

Authors:  Chad R Tracy; George M Ghareeb; Charles J Paul; Nathan A Brooks
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Treatment of renal stones with flexible ureteroscopy in preschool age children.

Authors:  Bulent Erkurt; Turhan Caskurlu; Gokhan Atis; Cenk Gurbuz; Ozgur Arikan; Eyup Sabri Pelit; Bulent Altay; Firat Erdogan; Asif Yildirim
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Factors Predicting Operating Room Time in Ureteroscopy and Ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Ioannis Katafigiotis; Itay M Sabler; Eliyahu M Heifetz; Ayman Isid; Stavros Sfoungaristos; Amitay Lorber; Vladimir Yutkin; Guy Hidas; Arie Latke; Ezekiel H Landau; Dov Pode; Ofer N Gofrit; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-07-20

10.  Success rate of repeat flexible ureteroscopy following previous failed access: An analysis of stent duration.

Authors:  Dylan T Hoare; Timothy A Wollin; Shubha De; Michael G Hobart
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.