Literature DB >> 27016497

How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project.

Samuel A Silver1, Ziv Harel2, Rory McQuillan3, Adam V Weizman4, Alison Thomas5, Glenn M Chertow4, Gihad Nesrallah6, Chaim M Bell7, Christopher T Chan3.   

Abstract

Quality improvement involves a combined effort among health care staff and stakeholders to diagnose and treat problems in the health care system. However, health care professionals often lack training in quality improvement methods, which makes it challenging to participate in improvement efforts. This article familiarizes health care professionals with how to begin a quality improvement project. The initial steps involve forming an improvement team that possesses expertise in the quality of care problem, leadership, and change management. Stakeholder mapping and analysis are useful tools at this stage, and these are reviewed to help identify individuals who might have a vested interest in the project. Physician engagement is a particularly important component of project success, and the knowledge that patients/caregivers can offer as members of a quality improvement team should not be overlooked. After a team is formed, an improvement framework helps to organize the scientific process of system change. Common quality improvement frameworks include Six Sigma, Lean, and the Model for Improvement. These models are contrasted, with a focus on the Model for Improvement, because it is widely used and applicable to a variety of quality of care problems without advanced training. It involves three steps: setting aims to focus improvement, choosing a balanced set of measures to determine if improvement occurs, and testing new ideas to change the current process. These new ideas are evaluated using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, where knowledge is gained by testing changes and reflecting on their effect. To show the real world utility of the quality improvement methods discussed, they are applied to a hypothetical quality improvement initiative that aims to promote home dialysis (home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis). This provides an example that kidney health care professionals can use to begin their own quality improvement projects.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery of Health Care; Hemodialysis; Home; Humans; Leadership; Quality Improvement; Total Quality Management; chronic kidney disease; clinical nephrology; end stage kidney disease; renal dialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016497      PMCID: PMC4858490          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.11491015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  26 in total

Review 1.  Can better understanding and use of treatment center performance feedback improve hemodialysis care? A role for the medical director.

Authors:  Peter B DeOreo; Raynel Wilson; Jay B Wish
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Measure, learn, and improve: physicians' involvement in quality improvement.

Authors:  Anne-Marie J Audet; Michelle M Doty; Jamil Shamasdin; Stephen C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Involving users in developing health services.

Authors:  Gillian M Craig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-01-29

4.  Perspective: Physician leadership in quality.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Marlene R Miller; Robert M Wachter; Gregg S Meyer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  The three faces of performance measurement: improvement, accountability, and research.

Authors:  L I Solberg; G Mosser; S McDonald
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1997-03

6.  The Statistical point of view of Quality: the Lean Six Sigma methodology.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Andrea Viti; Alberto Terzi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  How to Diagnose Solutions to a Quality of Care Problem.

Authors:  Ziv Harel; Samuel A Silver; Rory F McQuillan; Adam V Weizman; Alison Thomas; Glenn M Chertow; Gihad Nesrallah; Christopher T Chan; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Effects of Lean Six Sigma application in healthcare services: a literature review.

Authors:  Selim Ahmed; Noor H A Manaf; Rafikul Islam
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.458

9.  A primer on leading the improvement of systems.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-09

10.  Structured syncope care pathways based on lean six sigma methodology optimises resource use with shorter time to diagnosis and increased diagnostic yield.

Authors:  Leon Martens; Grahame Goode; Johan F H Wold; Lionel Beck; Georgina Martin; Christian Perings; Pelle Stolt; Lucas Baggerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  27 in total

1.  Roadmap to a successful quality improvement project.

Authors:  J R Swanson; S A Pearlman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Integrating Quality Improvement Education into the Nephrology Curricular Milestones Framework and the Clinical Learning Environment Review.

Authors:  Lisa K Prince; Dustin J Little; Katherine I Schexneider; Christina M Yuan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Quality improvement in pediatric nephrology-a practical guide.

Authors:  Marie-Michele Gaudreault-Tremblay; Rory F McQuillan; Rulan S Parekh; Damien Noone
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  How to Diagnose Solutions to a Quality of Care Problem.

Authors:  Ziv Harel; Samuel A Silver; Rory F McQuillan; Adam V Weizman; Alison Thomas; Glenn M Chertow; Gihad Nesrallah; Christopher T Chan; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  How to Sustain Change and Support Continuous Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Samuel A Silver; Rory McQuillan; Ziv Harel; Adam V Weizman; Alison Thomas; Gihad Nesrallah; Chaim M Bell; Christopher T Chan; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  How to Measure and Interpret Quality Improvement Data.

Authors:  Rory Francis McQuillan; Samuel Adam Silver; Ziv Harel; Adam Weizman; Alison Thomas; Chaim Bell; Glenn M Chertow; Christopher T Chan; Gihad Nesrallah
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Characteristics and Effectiveness of Dedicated Care Programs for Patients Starting Dialysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mirna Attalla; Zoe Friedman; Sandra McKeown; Ziv Harel; Jay Hingwala; Amber O Molnar; Patrick Norman; Samuel A Silver
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 8.  Quality improvement in pediatrics: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Stephanie P Schwartz; Kyle J Rehder
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.756

9.  Looking to Improve Your Practice? Consider the Science of Quality Improvement to Get Started.

Authors:  Alison R Snyder Valier
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Continuous quality improvement in nephrology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Wright Nunes; F Jacob Seagull; Panduranga Rao; Jonathan H Segal; Nandita S Mani; Michael Heung
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.