Literature DB >> 9103968

The three faces of performance measurement: improvement, accountability, and research.

L I Solberg1, G Mosser, S McDonald.   

Abstract

In the current climate of public accountability, many clinicians have become uncomfortable with any efforts to create measurement systems. That is unfortunate because measurements are absolutely essential to efforts for improving the processes of medical care. In their guideline implementation and measurement efforts, ISCI and the IMPROVE Project in Minnesota have gradually learned how to distinguish between measurement for improvement and that for accountability. Both approaches are different from the approach that physicians are used to in their encounters with medical research. Understanding these differences and respecting the confidentiality of individual medical groups has been crucial to moving past confusion and suspicion to genuine improvement actions involving multiple medical groups and their contracting managed care plans.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9103968     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30305-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  42 in total

1.  Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects.

Authors:  G Harvey; M Wensing
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-06

2.  Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care.

Authors:  H P Jung; M Wensing; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

3.  Factors that influence line managers' perceptions of hospital performance data.

Authors:  Liane Soberman Ginsburg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Texas pharmacists' opinions on reporting serious adverse drug events to the Food and Drug Administration: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Carolyn M Brown; Star Khoza
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-07-23

Review 5.  Development of quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery, using a 3-step modified Delphi approach.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Marko Simunovic; Bernard Langer; Hartley Stern; Adalsteinn D Brown
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Sepsis care bundles and clinicians.

Authors:  Robert G Masterton
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Advancing measurement of patient safety culture.

Authors:  Liane Ginsburg; Debra Gilin; Deborah Tregunno; Peter G Norton; Ward Flemons; Mark Fleming
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Development of a measure of patient safety event learning responses.

Authors:  Liane R Ginsburg; You-Ta Chuang; Peter G Norton; Whitney Berta; Deborah Tregunno; Peggy Ng; Julia Richardson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Samuel A Silver; Ziv Harel; Rory McQuillan; Adam V Weizman; Alison Thomas; Glenn M Chertow; Gihad Nesrallah; Chaim M Bell; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Determining the interviewer effect on CQ Index outcomes: a multilevel approach.

Authors:  Sjenny Winters; Mathilde H Strating; Niek S Klazinga; Rudolf B Kool; Robbert Huijsman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.