Literature DB >> 27906193

Roadmap to a successful quality improvement project.

J R Swanson1, S A Pearlman2.   

Abstract

Although the benefits of quality improvement initiatives are largely understood by practicing neonatologists and perinatologists, the vast majority have not received any formal training in quality improvement methodology. Even as reporting requirements of quality metrics has increased from a number of outside agencies and public reporting entities, education for physicians regarding how to carry out quality improvement projects has largely remained the individual's responsibility. The first in a series of quality improvement education papers, we focus on the reasons why quality improvement matters and how to develop a team of stakeholders that will be functional and productive in addressing specific quality and safety concerns.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27906193     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  25 in total

1.  Site of care influences breastmilk feedings at NICU discharge.

Authors:  Nancy G Powers; Barry Bloom; Joyce Peabody; Reese Clark
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  A primer on quality improvement methodology in neonatology.

Authors:  Dan L Ellsbury; Robert Ursprung
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  Leveraging Trainees to Improve Quality and Safety at the Point of Care: Three Models for Engagement.

Authors:  Laura Johnson Faherty; Kedar S Mate; James M Moses
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Implementing pay-for-performance in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jochen Profit; John A F Zupancic; Jeffrey B Gould; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Factors influencing breast milk versus formula feeding at discharge for very low birth weight infants in California.

Authors:  Henry Chong Lee; Jeffrey B Gould
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0/7)-38(6/7) weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Edward F Donovan; Carole Lannon; Jennifer Bailit; Barbara Rose; Jay D Iams; Terri Byczkowski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Why quality matters.

Authors:  S Pearlman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Necrotizing enterocolitis: is it time for zero tolerance?

Authors:  J R Swanson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Horbar; Joseph H Carpenter; Jeffrey Buzas; Roger F Soll; Gautham Suresh; Michael B Bracken; Laura C Leviton; Paul E Plsek; John C Sinclair
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-30

10.  Significant Reduction of Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Network of Diverse Neonatal Nurseries.

Authors:  Edward G Shepherd; Tami J Kelly; Jodi A Vinsel; Dennis J Cunningham; Erin Keels; Wendi Beauseau; Richard E McClead
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  5 in total

1.  The business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Hannah Ryan Fischer; Scott Davis Duncan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Identifying a quality improvement project.

Authors:  Lakshmi Katakam; Gautham K Suresh
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Measurement for quality improvement: using data to drive change.

Authors:  Munish Gupta; Heather C Kaplan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 4.  Advancements in neonatology through quality improvement.

Authors:  Stephen A Pearlman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Quality Improvement Initiatives in Reforming Patient Support Groups-Three-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Chieh-Liang Wu; Chia-Hua Liou; Shih-An Liu; Cheng-Hsu Chen; Wayne H-H Sheu; I-Ju Chou; Shang-Feng Tsai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.