Literature DB >> 27016498

How to Sustain Change and Support Continuous Quality Improvement.

Samuel A Silver1, Rory McQuillan2, Ziv Harel3, Adam V Weizman4, Alison Thomas5, Gihad Nesrallah6, Chaim M Bell7, Christopher T Chan2, Glenn M Chertow8.   

Abstract

To achieve sustainable change, quality improvement initiatives must become the new way of working rather than something added on to routine clinical care. However, most organizational change is not maintained. In this next article in this Moving Points in Nephrology feature on quality improvement, we provide health care professionals with strategies to sustain and support quality improvement. Threats to sustainability may be identified both at the beginning of a project and when it is ready for implementation. The National Health Service Sustainability Model is reviewed as one example to help identify issues that affect long-term success of quality improvement projects. Tools to help sustain improvement include process control boards, performance boards, standard work, and improvement huddles. Process control and performance boards are methods to communicate improvement results to staff and leadership. Standard work is a written or visual outline of current best practices for a task and provides a framework to ensure that changes that have improved patient care are consistently and reliably applied to every patient encounter. Improvement huddles are short, regular meetings among staff to anticipate problems, review performance, and support a culture of improvement. Many of these tools rely on principles of visual management, which are systems transparent and simple so that every staff member can rapidly distinguish normal from abnormal working conditions. Even when quality improvement methods are properly applied, the success of a project still depends on contextual factors. Context refers to aspects of the local setting in which the project operates. Context affects resources, leadership support, data infrastructure, team motivation, and team performance. For these reasons, the same project may thrive in a supportive context and fail in a different context. To demonstrate the practical applications of these quality improvement principles, these principles are applied to a hypothetical quality improvement initiative that aims to promote home dialysis (home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis).
Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic kidney disease; clinical nephrology; end stage kidney disease; health resources; hemodialysis; home; humans; organizational innovation; peritoneal dialysis; quality improvement; renal dialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016498      PMCID: PMC4858491          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.11501015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  20 in total

1.  The tension between needing to improve care and knowing how to do it.

Authors:  Andrew D Auerbach; C Seth Landefeld; Kaveh G Shojania
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Redesigning work processes in health care: lessons from the National Health Service.

Authors:  Chris Ham; Ruth Kipping; Hugh McLeod
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Tell me about the context, and more.

Authors:  David P Stevens; Kaveh G Shojania
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Lloyd P Provost; Craig M Froehle; Peter A Margolis
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  A 'work smarter, not harder' approach to improving healthcare quality.

Authors:  Christopher William Hayes; Paul B Batalden; Donald Goldmann
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions?

Authors:  Stephanie L Taylor; Sydney Dy; Robbie Foy; Susanne Hempel; Kathryn M McDonald; John Ovretveit; Peter J Pronovost; Lisa V Rubenstein; Robert M Wachter; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Samuel A Silver; Ziv Harel; Rory McQuillan; Adam V Weizman; Alison Thomas; Glenn M Chertow; Gihad Nesrallah; Chaim M Bell; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Effects of a quality improvement collaborative on the outcome of care of patients with HIV infection: the EQHIV study.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Ira B Wilson; Keith McInnes; Mary Beth Landrum; Lisa Hirschhorn; Peter V Marsden; David Gustafson; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success.

Authors:  John Øvretveit
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Avoiding failure: tools for successful and sustainable quality-improvement projects.

Authors:  Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23

2.  Integrating Quality Improvement Education into the Nephrology Curricular Milestones Framework and the Clinical Learning Environment Review.

Authors:  Lisa K Prince; Dustin J Little; Katherine I Schexneider; Christina M Yuan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  How to Measure and Interpret Quality Improvement Data.

Authors:  Rory Francis McQuillan; Samuel Adam Silver; Ziv Harel; Adam Weizman; Alison Thomas; Chaim Bell; Glenn M Chertow; Christopher T Chan; Gihad Nesrallah
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Strategies for the Management of CKD: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Samuel A Silver; Chaim M Bell; Glenn M Chertow; Prakesh S Shah; Kaveh Shojania; Ron Wald; Ziv Harel
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  A co-creation roadmap towards sustainable quality of care: A multi-method study.

Authors:  Fien Claessens; Deborah Seys; Jonas Brouwers; Astrid Van Wilder; Anneke Jans; Eva Marie Castro; Luk Bruyneel; Dirk De Ridder; Kris Vanhaecht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Characteristics of Durable Quality Improvement: A 6-Year Case Study.

Authors:  John-Paul J Yu; Anthony D Kuner; Tabassum A Kennedy
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Impact of a digital Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised on likelihood and age of autism diagnosis and referral for developmental evaluation.

Authors:  Samantha Major; Kathleen Campbell; Steven Espinosa; Jeffrey P Baker; Kimberly Lh Carpenter; Guillermo Sapiro; Saritha Vermeer; Geraldine Dawson
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2020-05-28

8.  Quality Improvement Goals for Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Kianoush Kashani; Mitchell Howard Rosner; Michael Haase; Andrew J P Lewington; Donal J O'Donoghue; F Perry Wilson; Mitra K Nadim; Samuel A Silver; Alexander Zarbock; Marlies Ostermann; Ravindra L Mehta; Sandra L Kane-Gill; Xiaoqiang Ding; Peter Pickkers; Azra Bihorac; Edward D Siew; Erin F Barreto; Etienne Macedo; John A Kellum; Paul M Palevsky; Ashita Jiwat Tolwani; Claudio Ronco; Luis A Juncos; Oleksa G Rewa; Sean M Bagshaw; Theresa Ann Mottes; Jay L Koyner; Kathleen D Liu; Lui G Forni; Michael Heung; Vin-Cent Wu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Implementation of an experiential learning strategy to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill adult patients.

Authors:  Hernán Michelángelo; Federico Angriman; Rodolfo Pizarro; Susana Bauque; Claudia Kecskes; Inés Staneloni; David García; Fidencia Espínola; Gustavo Mazer; Cristina Ferrari
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2019-11-13

10.  The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool: measuring organizational capacity to promote sustainability in healthcare.

Authors:  Sara Malone; Kim Prewitt; Rachel Hackett; John C Lin; Virginia McKay; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Douglas A Luke
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.