Literature DB >> 27001384

Optimal level of the reference transducer for central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure monitoring in supine, prone, and sitting position.

In-Kyung Song1, Han-Seul Park1, Ji-Hyun Lee1, Eun-Hee Kim1, Hee-Soo Kim1, Jae-Hyon Bahk1, Jin-Tae Kim2.   

Abstract

To guarantee accurate measurement of central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), proper positioning of a reference transducer is a prerequisite. We investigated ideal transducer levels in supine, prone, and sitting position in adults. Chest computed tomography images of 113 patients, taken in supine or prone position were reviewed. For supine position, distances between the back and the uppermost blood level of both atria and their ratios to the largest anteroposterior (AP) diameter of thorax were calculated. For prone position, same distances and ratios were calculated from the anterior chest. For sitting position, distances between the mid-sternoclavicular joint and the most cephalad blood level of both atria and their ratios to the sternal length were calculated. The ratio of the uppermost blood level of right atrium (RA) and left atrium (LA) to the largest AP diameter of thorax was 0.81 ± 0.04 and 0.59 ± 0.03 from the back in supine position. That calculated from the anterior chest in prone position was 0.54 ± 0.03 and 0.46 ± 0.03. The ratio of the most cephalad blood level of RA and LA to the sternal length was 0.70 ± 0.10 and 0.68 ± 0.09 from the mid-sternoclavicular joint in sitting position, which corresponded to the upper border of 4th rib. Optimal CVP transducer levels are at four-fifths of the AP diameter of thorax in supine position, at a half of that in prone position, and at upper border of the 4th sternochondral joint in sitting position. PAOP transducer levels are similar in prone and sitting position, except for supine position which is at three-fifths of the AP diameter of thorax.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central venous pressure; Pressure; Prone position; Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; Transducers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27001384     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9864-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  8 in total

Review 1.  Arterial and central venous pressure monitoring.

Authors:  James A L Pittman; John Sum Ping; Jonathan B Mark
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2004

2.  Uppermost blood levels of the right and left atria in the supine position: implication for measuring central venous pressure and pulmonary artery wedge pressure.

Authors:  Jeong-Hwa Seo; Chul-Woo Jung; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Evidence-based practice habits: transforming research into bedside practice.

Authors:  Carol A Rauen; Mary Beth Flynn Makic; Elizabeth Bridges
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.708

4.  Error in central venous pressure measurement.

Authors:  Katie K Figg; Edward C Nemergut
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  ACC expert consensus document. Present use of bedside right heart catheterization in patients with cardiac disease. American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  H S Mueller; K Chatterjee; K B Davis; M A Fifer; C Franklin; M A Greenberg; A J Labovitz; P K Shah; K J Tuman; M H Weil; W S Weintraub
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Central venous pressure: we need to bring clinical use into physiological context.

Authors:  S Sondergaard; G Parkin; A Aneman
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Echocardiographic determination of valid zero reference levels in supine and lateral positions.

Authors:  L L Kee; J S Simonson; N A Stotts; P Skov; N B Schiller
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Anatomically and physiologically based reference level for measurement of intracardiac pressures.

Authors:  M Courtois; P G Fattal; S J Kovács; A J Tiefenbrunn; P A Ludbrook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Evaluation of external reference levels for central venous pressure measurements of severely obese patients in the supine position.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Mizunoya; Hitoshi Saito; Yuji Morimoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Optimal Transducer Level for Atrial and Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Measurement in Patients with Functional Single Ventricle.

Authors:  Yong-Hee Park; Da-Hye Yoo; Eun-Hee Kim; In-Kyung Song; Ji-Hyun Lee; Hee-Soo Kim; Woong-Han Kim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  The contemporary pulmonary artery catheter. Part 1: placement and waveform analysis.

Authors:  I T Bootsma; E C Boerma; F de Lange; T W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.502

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.