Literature DB >> 25684176

Central venous pressure: we need to bring clinical use into physiological context.

S Sondergaard1, G Parkin, A Aneman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The place of central venous pressure (CVP) measurement in acute care has been questioned during the past decade. We reviewed its physiological importance, utility and clinical use among anaesthetists and intensivists.
METHODS: A literature search using the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed in regard to details of the physiology, measurement and interpretation of CVP. A questionnaire was conducted among members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine concerning knowledge and uses of CVP.
RESULTS: Aligning pressure transducers to the phlebostatic axis was handled inadequately. The unsuitability of CVP to assess the intravascular volume state was generally recognised by clinicians. Still, many used CVP to guide volume resuscitation in the absence of a cardiac output monitor, while the literature positioned CVP as a useful haemodynamic variable only in the expanded context of being one determinant of the driving pressure for venous return and hence cardiac output.
CONCLUSION: The correct measurement of CVP is pivotal to its proper clinical application. This relates to defining the pressure gradient for venous return and heart efficiency. The clinical appreciation of CVP should be restored by educational efforts of its physiological context.
© 2015 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684176     DOI: 10.1111/aas.12490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  9 in total

1.  [CVP - farewell? Please don't! : Comments on the S3 guidelines on "intravascular volume therapy in adults"].

Authors:  B H Siegler; M Bernhard; T Brenner; H Gerlach; M Henrich; S Hofer; E Kilger; W A Krüger; C Lichtenstern; K Mayer; M Müller; B Niemann; M Oppert; S Rex; R Rossaint; S Weiterer; M A Weigand
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Optimal level of the reference transducer for central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure monitoring in supine, prone, and sitting position.

Authors:  In-Kyung Song; Han-Seul Park; Ji-Hyun Lee; Eun-Hee Kim; Hee-Soo Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Identifying the position of the right atrium to align pressure transducer for CVP : Spirit level or 3D electromagnetic positioning?

Authors:  S Avellan; I Uhr; D McKelvey; Soren Sondergaard
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  T G Eskesen; M Wetterslev; A Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Fluid management in living donor hepatectomy: Recent issues and perspectives.

Authors:  Seong-Soo Choi; Sung-Hoon Kim; Young-Kug Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Hemodynamic Parameters in the Assessment of Fluid Status in a Porcine Hemorrhage and Resuscitation Model.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Kyle M Hocking; Monica E Polcz; Gregory J Beilman; Colleen M Brophy; Jenna H Sobey; Philip J Leisy; Roy K Kiberenge; Bret D Alvis
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 7.  Enhanced recovery after surgery in liver resection: current concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Vandana Agarwal; Jigeeshu V Divatia
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-03-06

8.  Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Longxiang Su; Pan Pan; Dongkai Li; Qing Zhang; Xiang Zhou; Yun Long; Xiaoting Wang; Dawei Liu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-15

9.  Clinical validation of a computerized algorithm to determine mean systemic filling pressure.

Authors:  Loek P B Meijs; Joris van Houte; Bente C M Conjaerts; Alexander J G H Bindels; Arthur Bouwman; Saskia Houterman; Jan Bakker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.502

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.