Literature DB >> 29808259

Evaluation of external reference levels for central venous pressure measurements of severely obese patients in the supine position.

Kazuyuki Mizunoya1, Hitoshi Saito2, Yuji Morimoto2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A proper reference level is important for measuring intracardiac pressures, especially for parameters with small normal values such as central venous pressure (CVP). Although several external zero reference levels (eZRLs) have been proposed for non-obese patients, none has been reported for severely obese patients. The aim of this study was to investigate an appropriate eZRL for CVP measurements of severely obese patients.
METHODS: Chest computed tomography images of 65 patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 were retrospectively reviewed. The anteroposterior thoracic diameter and height of the mid-right atrium (RA) were measured. Four reported eZRLs for CVP measurements (midthoracic level, two-thirds and four-fifths of the thoracic diameter above table level, and 5 cm below the anterior thorax) were examined for error when predicting the midpoint of the RA.
RESULTS: The median BMI was 36.9 kg/m2 [interquartile range (IQR), 36.0-39.2]. There was a significant difference in the calculated errors for the midpoint of the RA among the four eZRLs (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001). Two-thirds of the thoracic diameter above table level was the most accurate reference level for CVP measurement (Steel-Dwass post hoc analysis, P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed acceptable agreement for clinical use (mean difference, - 7 mm; 95% limit of agreement, - 23 to 9 mm).
CONCLUSION: The most accurate eZRL for CVP measurements of severely obese patients in the supine position was two-thirds of the thoracic diameter above table level. This result is consistent with that of a previous report of non-obese patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central venous pressure; Reference level; Severe obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29808259     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-018-2513-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  20 in total

Review 1.  Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Central venous pressure: A useful but not so simple measurement.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Uppermost blood levels of the right and left atria in the supine position: implication for measuring central venous pressure and pulmonary artery wedge pressure.

Authors:  Jeong-Hwa Seo; Chul-Woo Jung; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  [Epidemiological aspects of overweight and obesity in Japan--international comparisons].

Authors:  Nobuo Yoshiike; Miki Miyoshi
Journal:  Nihon Rinsho       Date:  2013-02

5.  Echocardiographic determination of valid zero reference levels in supine and lateral positions.

Authors:  L L Kee; J S Simonson; N A Stotts; P Skov; N B Schiller
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Variability in the establishment of an external reference point for central venous pressure measurement in children.

Authors:  Aline S C Belela; Mavilde L G Pedreira; Maria Angélica S Peterlini; Denise M Kusahara; Werther B Carvalho; Gisele C Gentil
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.197

7.  Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.

Authors:  David Osman; Christophe Ridel; Patrick Ray; Xavier Monnet; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Reference Levels for Central Venous Pressure and Pulmonary Artery Occlusion Pressure Monitoring in the Lateral Position.

Authors:  In-Kyung Song; Soohan Ro; Ji-Hyun Lee; Eun-Hee Kim; Hee-Soo Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 9.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  How central obesity influences intra-abdominal pressure: a prospective, observational study in cardiothoracic surgical patients.

Authors:  Marije Smit; Maureen J M Werner; Annemieke Oude Lansink-Hartgring; Willem Dieperink; Jan G Zijlstra; Matijs van Meurs
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  1 in total

1.  Update on the assessment of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.078

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.