Marius Fischer1,2, Bernhard Fuerst3,4, Sing Chun Lee2, Javad Fotouhi2, Severine Habert5, Simon Weidert1, Ekkehard Euler1, Greg Osgood6, Nassir Navab2,5. 1. Trauma Surgery Department, Klinikum Innenstadt, LMU, Munich, Germany. 2. Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America. 3. Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America. be.fuerst@jhu.edu. 4. Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. be.fuerst@jhu.edu. 5. Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 6. Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In many orthopedic surgeries, there is a demand for correctly placing medical instruments (e.g., K-wire or drill) to perform bone fracture repairs. The main challenge is the mental alignment of X-ray images acquired using a C-arm, the medical instruments, and the patient, which dramatically increases in complexity during pelvic surgeries. Current solutions include the continuous acquisition of many intra-operative X-ray images from various views, which will result in high radiation exposure, long surgical durations, and significant effort and frustration for the surgical staff. This work conducts a preclinical usability study to test and evaluate mixed reality visualization techniques using intra-operative X-ray, optical, and RGBD imaging to augment the surgeon's view to assist accurate placement of tools. METHOD: We design and perform a usability study to compare the performance of surgeons and their task load using three different mixed reality systems during K-wire placements. The three systems are interventional X-ray imaging, X-ray augmentation on 2D video, and 3D surface reconstruction augmented by digitally reconstructed radiographs and live tool visualization. RESULTS: The evaluation criteria include duration, number of X-ray images acquired, placement accuracy, and the surgical task load, which are observed during 21 clinically relevant interventions performed by surgeons on phantoms. Finally, we test for statistically significant improvements and show that the mixed reality visualization leads to a significantly improved efficiency. CONCLUSION: The 3D visualization of patient, tool, and DRR shows clear advantages over the conventional X-ray imaging and provides intuitive feedback to place the medical tools correctly and efficiently.
PURPOSE: In many orthopedic surgeries, there is a demand for correctly placing medical instruments (e.g., K-wire or drill) to perform bone fracture repairs. The main challenge is the mental alignment of X-ray images acquired using a C-arm, the medical instruments, and the patient, which dramatically increases in complexity during pelvic surgeries. Current solutions include the continuous acquisition of many intra-operative X-ray images from various views, which will result in high radiation exposure, long surgical durations, and significant effort and frustration for the surgical staff. This work conducts a preclinical usability study to test and evaluate mixed reality visualization techniques using intra-operative X-ray, optical, and RGBD imaging to augment the surgeon's view to assist accurate placement of tools. METHOD: We design and perform a usability study to compare the performance of surgeons and their task load using three different mixed reality systems during K-wire placements. The three systems are interventional X-ray imaging, X-ray augmentation on 2D video, and 3D surface reconstruction augmented by digitally reconstructed radiographs and live tool visualization. RESULTS: The evaluation criteria include duration, number of X-ray images acquired, placement accuracy, and the surgical task load, which are observed during 21 clinically relevant interventions performed by surgeons on phantoms. Finally, we test for statistically significant improvements and show that the mixed reality visualization leads to a significantly improved efficiency. CONCLUSION: The 3D visualization of patient, tool, and DRR shows clear advantages over the conventional X-ray imaging and provides intuitive feedback to place the medical tools correctly and efficiently.
Entities:
Keywords:
Interventional imaging; Orthopedic and Trauma surgery; Usability study
Authors: S Reaungamornrat; Y Otake; A Uneri; S Schafer; D J Mirota; S Nithiananthan; J W Stayman; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; R H Taylor; J H Siewerdsen Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Javad Fotouhi; Clayton P Alexander; Mathias Unberath; Giacomo Taylor; Sing Chun Lee; Bernhard Fuerst; Alex Johnson; Greg Osgood; Russell H Taylor; Harpal Khanuja; Mehran Armand; Nassir Navab Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-01-04
Authors: Sebastian Andress; Alex Johnson; Mathias Unberath; Alexander Felix Winkler; Kevin Yu; Javad Fotouhi; Simon Weidert; Greg Osgood; Nassir Navab Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-01-26
Authors: Javad Fotouhi; Bernhard Fuerst; Alex Johnson; Sing Chun Lee; Russell Taylor; Greg Osgood; Nassir Navab; Mehran Armand Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Javad Fotouhi; Bernhard Fuerst; Mathias Unberath; Stefan Reichenstein; Sing Chun Lee; Alex A Johnson; Greg M Osgood; Mehran Armand; Nassir Navab Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Joon Ha; Priya Parekh; David Gamble; James Masters; Peter Jun; Thomas Hester; Timothy Daniels; Mansur Halai Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2021-05-05