Literature DB >> 34751894

Augmented Reality (AR) in Orthopedics: Current Applications and Future Directions.

Andrew A Furman1,2, Wellington K Hsu3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Imaging technologies (X-ray, CT, MRI, and ultrasound) have revolutionized orthopedic surgery, allowing for the more efficient diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of musculoskeletal aliments. The current review investigates recent literature surrounding the impact of augmented reality (AR) imaging technologies on orthopedic surgery. In particular, it investigates the impact that AR technologies may have on provider cognitive burden, operative times, occupational radiation exposure, and surgical precision and outcomes. RECENT
FINDINGS: Many AR technologies have been shown to lower provider cognitive burden and reduce operative time and radiation exposure while improving surgical precision in pre-clinical cadaveric and sawbones models. So far, only a few platforms focusing on pedicle screw placement have been approved by the FDA. These technologies have been implemented clinically with mixed results when compared to traditional free-hand approaches. It remains to be seen if current AR technologies can deliver upon their multitude of promises, and the ability to do so seems contingent upon continued technological progress. Additionally, the impact of these platforms will likely be highly conditional on clinical indication and provider type. It remains unclear if AR will be broadly accepted and utilized or if it will be reserved for niche indications where it adds significant value. One thing is clear, orthopedics' high utilization of pre- and intra-operative imaging, combined with the relative ease of tracking rigid structures like bone as compared to soft tissues, has made it the clear beachhead market for AR technologies in medicine.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Extended reality; Imaging; Orthopedics; Surgical navigation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34751894      PMCID: PMC8733124          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-021-09728-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  36 in total

1.  Evaluation of a portable image overlay projector for the visualisation of surgical navigation data: phantom studies.

Authors:  K Gavaghan; T Oliveira-Santos; M Peterhans; M Reyes; H Kim; S Anderegg; S Weber
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Camera augmented mobile C-arm (CAMC): calibration, accuracy study, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Nassir Navab; Sandro-Michael Heining; Joerg Traub
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  The effect of augmented reality training on percutaneous needle placement in spinal facet joint injections.

Authors:  Caitlin T Yeo; Tamas Ungi; Paweena U-Thainual; Andras Lasso; Robert C McGraw; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study.

Authors:  Longfei Ma; Zhe Zhao; Fang Chen; Boyu Zhang; Ligong Fu; Hongen Liao
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Intra-operative augmented reality in distal locking.

Authors:  Roberto Londei; Marco Esposito; Benoit Diotte; Simon Weidert; Ekkehard Euler; Peter Thaller; Nassir Navab; Pascal Fallavollita
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  MR image overlay guidance: system evaluation for preclinical use.

Authors:  Paweena U-Thainual; Jan Fritz; Choladawan Moonjaita; Tamas Ungi; Aaron Flammang; John A Carrino; Gabor Fichtinger; Iulian Iordachita
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Preclinical usability study of multiple augmented reality concepts for K-wire placement.

Authors:  Marius Fischer; Bernhard Fuerst; Sing Chun Lee; Javad Fotouhi; Severine Habert; Simon Weidert; Ekkehard Euler; Greg Osgood; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  An augmented reality C-arm for intraoperative assessment of the mechanical axis: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Pascal Fallavollita; Alexander Brand; Lejing Wang; Ekkehard Euler; Peter Thaller; Nassir Navab; Simon Weidert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Can Augmented Reality Be Helpful in Pelvic Bone Cancer Surgery? An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Hwan Seong Cho; Min Suk Park; Sanjay Gupta; Ilkyu Han; Han-Soo Kim; Hyunseok Choi; Jaesung Hong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Augmented reality patient-specific reconstruction plate design for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery.

Authors:  Fangyang Shen; Bailiang Chen; Qingshan Guo; Yue Qi; Yue Shen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.