| Literature DB >> 26973716 |
Takahiro Yamashita1, Mitsuyoshi Ishida1, Shiho Asakawa2, Hiroyuki Kanamori3, Harumi Sasaki3, Akifumi Ogino1, Yuichi Katayose3, Tamao Hatta4, Hiroshi Yokoyama1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carbon-based materials are commonly used as anodes in microbial fuel cells (MFCs), whereas metal and metal-oxide-based materials are not used frequently because of low electrical output. Stainless steel is a low-cost material with high conductivity and physical strength. In this study, we investigated the power generation using flame-oxidized (FO) stainless steel anodes (SSAs) in single-chambered air-cathode MFCs. The FO-SSA performance was compared to the performance of untreated SSA and carbon cloth anode (CCA), a common carbonaceous electrode. The difference in the anodic community structures was analyzed using high-throughput sequencing of the V4 region in 16S rRNA gene.Entities:
Keywords: Community structure; Energy recovery; Flame oxidation; Geobacter; Microbial fuel cell; Stainless steel; Wastewater treatment
Year: 2016 PMID: 26973716 PMCID: PMC4788886 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0480-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Change in the SSA surface caused by flame oxidation. a SEM images of untreated SSA (left) and FO-SSA (right). The scale bars represent 100 μm (top), 10 μm (middle), and 5 μm (bottom). b BEC image of FO-SSA. The bar represents 10 μm. c XPS profiles of untreated SSA and FO-SSA
Fig. 2Characterization of the FO-SSA surface. a SEM–EDS images of FO-SSA for each atom. Bars represent 20 μm. b XRD profiles of untreated SSA and FO-SSA. Sus SUS304 (Cr, 0.19; Fe, 0.7; Ni, 0.11), Hem hematite, Chr chromite
Fig. 3Comparison of FO-SSA with CCA and untreated SSA in MFCs equipped with membranes. The peptone medium was used as the feedstock for the MFCs. Power density (a), polarization curves for the anodes and cathodes (b), and CV profiles (c) are shown. In b, data for the anodes and corresponding cathodes are represented as solid and clear circles, respectively
Fig. 4Electricity generation by FO-SSA in membrane-less MFCs. MFCs with FO-SSA3 and FO-SSA4 were fed with the peptone and acetate media, respectively. Power density (a), polarization curves for the anodes and cathodes (b), and CV profiles (c) are shown. In b, data for the anodes and corresponding cathodes are represented as solid and clear circles, respectively
Fig. 5Bacterial community structures in the anodic biofilms and AS (inoculum) at the phylum (a) and genus (b) levels, as analyzed using the 16S rRNA gene
Distribution of the Geobacter species in anodic biofilms
| Most closely related species | FO-SSA5 | FO-SSA6 | CCA3 | SSA3 | FO-SSA7-o.c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 96.5 | 93.6 | 1.4 | 6.4 | 0.1 |
|
| 2.0 | 1.0 | 8.9 | 17.7 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.8 | 0.2 | 54.7 | 66.9 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
|
| 0.2 | 0.8 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.1 | 1.6 | 20.4 | 0.6 | 99.7 |
|
| 0.0 | 1.6 | 5.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Values indicate the percentage of the number of reads assigned to the species per number of reads assigned to the genus Geobacter