Literature DB >> 12620842

Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes.

Daniel R Bond1, Derek R Lovley.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that members of the Geobacteraceae can use electrodes as electron acceptors for anaerobic respiration. In order to better understand this electron transfer process for energy production, Geobacter sulfurreducens was inoculated into chambers in which a graphite electrode served as the sole electron acceptor and acetate or hydrogen was the electron donor. The electron-accepting electrodes were maintained at oxidizing potentials by connecting them to similar electrodes in oxygenated medium (fuel cells) or to potentiostats that poised electrodes at +0.2 V versus an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (poised potential). When a small inoculum of G. sulfurreducens was introduced into electrode-containing chambers, electrical current production was dependent upon oxidation of acetate to carbon dioxide and increased exponentially, indicating for the first time that electrode reduction supported the growth of this organism. When the medium was replaced with an anaerobic buffer lacking nutrients required for growth, acetate-dependent electrical current production was unaffected and cells attached to these electrodes continued to generate electrical current for weeks. This represents the first report of microbial electricity production solely by cells attached to an electrode. Electrode-attached cells completely oxidized acetate to levels below detection (<10 micro M), and hydrogen was metabolized to a threshold of 3 Pa. The rates of electron transfer to electrodes (0.21 to 1.2 micro mol of electrons/mg of protein/min) were similar to those observed for respiration with Fe(III) citrate as the electron acceptor (E(o)' =+0.37 V). The production of current in microbial fuel cell (65 mA/m(2) of electrode surface) or poised-potential (163 to 1,143 mA/m(2)) mode was greater than what has been reported for other microbial systems, even those that employed higher cell densities and electron-shuttling compounds. Since acetate was completely oxidized, the efficiency of conversion of organic electron donor to electricity was significantly higher than in previously described microbial fuel cells. These results suggest that the effectiveness of microbial fuel cells can be increased with organisms such as G. sulfurreducens that can attach to electrodes and remain viable for long periods of time while completely oxidizing organic substrates with quantitative transfer of electrons to an electrode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12620842      PMCID: PMC150094          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1548-1555.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  18 in total

1.  Harnessing microbially generated power on the seafloor.

Authors:  Leonard M Tender; Clare E Reimers; Hilmar A Stecher; Dawn E Holmes; Daniel R Bond; Daniel A Lowy; Kanoelani Pilobello; Stephanie J Fertig; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Organic matter mineralization with reduction of ferric iron in anaerobic sediments.

Authors:  D R Lovley; E J Phillips
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese.

Authors:  D R Lovley; E J Phillips
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Electricity generation in microbial fuel cells using neutral red as an electronophore.

Authors:  D H Park; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Growth of geobacter sulfurreducens with acetate in syntrophic cooperation with hydrogen-oxidizing anaerobic partners

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Lack of production of electron-shuttling compounds or solubilization of Fe(III) during reduction of insoluble Fe(III) oxide by Geobacter metallireducens.

Authors:  K P Nevin; D R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effect of initial carbon sources on the performance of microbial fuel cells containing Proteus vulgaris.

Authors:  N Kim; Y Choi; S Jung; S Kim
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Geobacter metallireducens accesses insoluble Fe(III) oxide by chemotaxis.

Authors:  Susan E Childers; Stacy Ciufo; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mechanisms for accessing insoluble Fe(III) oxide during dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction by Geothrix fermentans.

Authors:  Kelly P Nevin; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  OmcB, a c-type polyheme cytochrome, involved in Fe(III) reduction in Geobacter sulfurreducens.

Authors:  Ching Leang; M V Coppi; D R Lovley
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  207 in total

1.  Enhancement of survival and electricity production in an engineered bacterium by light-driven proton pumping.

Authors:  Ethan T Johnson; Daniel B Baron; Belén Naranjo; Daniel R Bond; Claudia Schmidt-Dannert; Jeffrey A Gralnick
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Disruption of the putative cell surface polysaccharide biosynthesis gene SO3177 in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 enhances adhesion to electrodes and current generation in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Atsushi Kouzuma; Xian-Ying Meng; Nobutada Kimura; Kazuhito Hashimoto; Kazuya Watanabe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Dissimilatory reduction of extracellular electron acceptors in anaerobic respiration.

Authors:  Katrin Richter; Marcus Schicklberger; Johannes Gescher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Two isoforms of Geobacter sulfurreducens PilA have distinct roles in pilus biogenesis, cytochrome localization, extracellular electron transfer, and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Lubna V Richter; Steven J Sandler; Robert M Weis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Microbial interspecies electron transfer via electric currents through conductive minerals.

Authors:  Souichiro Kato; Kazuhito Hashimoto; Kazuya Watanabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Microbial electrosynthesis - revisiting the electrical route for microbial production.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; René A Rozendal
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 7.  In situ to in silico and back: elucidating the physiology and ecology of Geobacter spp. using genome-scale modelling.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Characterization and transcription of arsenic respiration and resistance genes during in situ uranium bioremediation.

Authors:  Ludovic Giloteaux; Dawn E Holmes; Kenneth H Williams; Kelly C Wrighton; Michael J Wilkins; Alison P Montgomery; Jessica A Smith; Roberto Orellana; Courtney A Thompson; Thomas J Roper; Philip E Long; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Lack of electricity production by Pelobacter carbinolicus indicates that the capacity for Fe(III) oxide reduction does not necessarily confer electron transfer ability to fuel cell anodes.

Authors:  Hanno Richter; Martin Lanthier; Kelly P Nevin; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Going wireless: Fe(III) oxide reduction without pili by Geobacter sulfurreducens strain JS-1.

Authors:  Jessica A Smith; Pier-Luc Tremblay; Pravin Malla Shrestha; Oona L Snoeyenbos-West; Ashley E Franks; Kelly P Nevin; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.