Literature DB >> 19820150

Hydrogen production by geobacter species and a mixed consortium in a microbial electrolysis cell.

Douglas F Call1, Rachel C Wagner, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

A hydrogen utilizing exoelectrogenic bacterium (Geobacter sulfurreducens) was compared to both a nonhydrogen oxidizer (Geobacter metallireducens) and a mixed consortium in order to compare the hydrogen production rates and hydrogen recoveries of pure and mixed cultures in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs). At an applied voltage of 0.7 V, both G. sulfurreducens and the mixed culture generated similar current densities (ca. 160 A/m3), resulting in hydrogen production rates of ca. 1.9 m(3) H2/m3/day, whereas G. metallireducens exhibited lower current densities and production rates of 110 +/- 7 A/m3 and 1.3 +/- 0.1 m3 H2/m3/day, respectively. Before methane was detected in the mixed-culture MEC, the mixed consortium achieved the highest overall energy recovery (relative to both electricity and substrate energy inputs) of 82% +/- 8% compared to G. sulfurreducens (77% +/- 2%) and G. metallireducens (78% +/- 5%), due to the higher coulombic efficiency of the mixed consortium. At an applied voltage of 0.4 V, methane production increased in the mixed-culture MEC and, as a result, the hydrogen recovery decreased and the overall energy recovery dropped to 38% +/- 16% compared to 80% +/- 5% for G. sulfurreducens and 76% +/- 0% for G. metallireducens. Internal hydrogen recycling was confirmed since the mixed culture generated a stable current density of 31 +/- 0 A/m3 when fed hydrogen gas, whereas G. sulfurreducens exhibited a steady decrease in current production. Community analysis suggested that G. sulfurreducens was predominant in the mixed-culture MEC (72% of clones) despite its relative absence in the mixed-culture inoculum obtained from a microbial fuel cell reactor (2% of clones). These results demonstrate that Geobacter species are capable of obtaining similar hydrogen production rates and energy recoveries as mixed cultures in an MEC and that high coulombic efficiencies in mixed culture MECs can be attributed in part to the recycling of hydrogen into current.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19820150      PMCID: PMC2794111          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01760-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of electrode reduction activities of Geobacter sulfurreducens and an enriched consortium in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Kazuya Watanabe; Soichi Yabuki; Bruce E Logan; Yuji Sekiguchi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  K P Nevin; H Richter; S F Covalla; J P Johnson; T L Woodard; A L Orloff; H Jia; M Zhang; D R Lovley
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese.

Authors:  D R Lovley; E J Phillips
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  High power density from a miniature microbial fuel cell using Shewanella oneidensis DSP10.

Authors:  Bradley R Ringeisen; Emily Henderson; Peter K Wu; Jeremy Pietron; Ricky Ray; Brenda Little; Justin C Biffinger; Joanne M Jones-Meehan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Hydrogen production with a microbial biocathode.

Authors:  René A Rozendal; Adriaan W Jeremiasse; Hubertus V M Hamelers; Cees J N Buisman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane.

Authors:  Douglas Call; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Hydrogen and methane production from swine wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells.

Authors:  Rachel C Wagner; John M Regan; Sang-Eun Oh; Yi Zuo; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Selection of a variant of Geobacter sulfurreducens with enhanced capacity for current production in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Hana Yi; Kelly P Nevin; Byoung-Chan Kim; Ashely E Franks; Anna Klimes; Leonard M Tender; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Geobacter sulfurreducens strain engineered for increased rates of respiration.

Authors:  Mounir Izallalen; Radhakrishnan Mahadevan; Anthony Burgard; Bradley Postier; Raymond Didonato; Jun Sun; Christopher H Schilling; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 9.783

10.  Growth with high planktonic biomass in Shewanella oneidensis fuel cells.

Authors:  Martin Lanthier; Kelvin B Gregory; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  16 in total

1.  Influence of external resistance on electrogenesis, methanogenesis, and anode prokaryotic communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Sokhee Jung; John M Regan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Lactate oxidation coupled to iron or electrode reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA.

Authors:  Douglas F Call; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Electrochemical techniques for evaluating short-chain fatty acid utilization by bioanodes.

Authors:  Wendy Huang; Younggy Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Use of a coculture to enable current production by geobacter sulfurreducens.

Authors:  Youpeng Qu; Yujie Feng; Xin Wang; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Electron donors supporting growth and electroactivity of Geobacter sulfurreducens anode biofilms.

Authors:  Allison M Speers; Gemma Reguera
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Enrichment of microbial electrolysis cell biocathodes from sediment microbial fuel cell bioanodes.

Authors:  John M Pisciotta; Zehra Zaybak; Douglas F Call; Joo-Youn Nam; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Enhanced microbial electrosynthesis by using defined co-cultures.

Authors:  Jörg S Deutzmann; Alfred M Spormann
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Olive mill wastewater treatment in single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Hakan Bermek; Tunc Catal; S Süha Akan; Mehmet Sefa Ulutaş; Mert Kumru; Mine Özgüven; Hong Liu; Beraat Özçelik; Alper Tunga Akarsubaşı
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 9.  Electrochemically active biofilms: facts and fiction. A review.

Authors:  Jerome Babauta; Ryan Renslow; Zbigniew Lewandowski; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.209

10.  Competition of two highly specialized and efficient acetoclastic electroactive bacteria for acetate in biofilm anode of microbial electrolysis cell.

Authors:  Veerraghavulu Sapireddy; Krishna P Katuri; Ali Muhammad; Pascal E Saikaly
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 7.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.