Literature DB >> 15298217

Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane.

Hong Liu1, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are typically designed as a two-chamber system with the bacteria in the anode chamber separated from the cathode chamber by a polymeric proton exchange membrane (PEM). Most MFCs use aqueous cathodes where water is bubbled with air to provide dissolved oxygen to electrode. To increase energy output and reduce the cost of MFCs, we examined power generation in an air-cathode MFC containing carbon electrodes in the presence and absence of a polymeric proton exchange membrane (PEM). Bacteria present in domestic wastewater were used as the biocatalyst, and glucose and wastewater were tested as substrates. Power density was found to be much greater than typically reported for aqueous-cathode MFCs, reaching a maximum of 262 +/- 10 mW/m2 (6.6 +/- 0.3 mW/L; liquid volume) using glucose. Removing the PEM increased the maximum power density to 494 +/- 21 mW/m2 (12.5 +/- 0.5 mW/L). Coulombic efficiency was 40-55% with the PEM and 9-12% with the PEM removed, indicating substantial oxygen diffusion into the anode chamber in the absence of the PEM. Power output increased with glucose concentration according to saturation-type kinetics, with a half saturation constant of 79 mg/L with the PEM-MFC and 103 mg/L in the MFC without a PEM (1000 omega resistor). Similar results on the effect of the PEM on power density were found using wastewater, where 28 +/- 3 mW/m2 (0.7 +/- 0.1 mW/L) (28% Coulombic efficiency) was produced with the PEM, and 146 +/- 8 mW/m2 (3.7 +/- 0.2 mW/L) (20% Coulombic efficiency) was produced when the PEM was removed. The increase in power output when a PEM was removed was attributed to a higher cathode potential as shown by an increase in the open circuit potential. An analysis based on available anode surface area and maximum bacterial growth rates suggests that mediatorless MFCs may have an upper order-of-magnitude limit in power density of 10(3) mW/m2. A cost-effective approach to achieving power densities in this range will likely require systems that do not contain a polymeric PEM in the MFC and systems based on direct oxygen transfer to a carbon cathode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15298217     DOI: 10.1021/es0499344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  69 in total

1.  A perspective on microfluidic biofuel cells.

Authors:  Jin Wook Lee; Erik Kjeang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Simultaneous wastewater treatment and bioelectricity production in microbial fuel cells using cross-linked chitosan-graphene oxide mixed-matrix membranes.

Authors:  Shima L Holder; Ching-Hwa Lee; Srinivasa R Popuri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Removal of odors from Swine wastewater by using microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Jung Rae Kim; Jerzy Dec; Mary Ann Bruns; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Substrate degradation kinetics, microbial diversity, and current efficiency of microbial fuel cells supplied with marine plankton.

Authors:  Clare E Reimers; Hilmar A Stecher; John C Westall; Yvan Alleau; Kate A Howell; Leslie Soule; Helen K White; Peter R Girguis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparison of electrode reduction activities of Geobacter sulfurreducens and an enriched consortium in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Kazuya Watanabe; Soichi Yabuki; Bruce E Logan; Yuji Sekiguchi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Urea removal coupled with enhanced electricity generation in single-chambered microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Luguang Wang; Beizhen Xie; Ningshengjie Gao; Booki Min; Hong Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The reaction of wastewater treatment and power generation of single chamber microbial fuel cell against substrate concentration and anode distributions.

Authors:  Sing-Mei Tan; Soon-An Ong; Li-Ngee Ho; Yee-Shian Wong; Wei-Eng Thung; Tean-Peng Teoh
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-07-24

8.  Microbial fuel cell characterisation and evaluation of Lysinibacillus macroides MFC02 electrigenic capability.

Authors:  Murugan Uma Vanitha; Muthusamy Natarajan; Harikrishnamoorthy Sridhar; Sankaran Umamaheswari
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Processes and electron flow in a microbial electrolysis cell bioanode fed with furanic and phenolic compounds.

Authors:  Xiaofei Zeng; Abhijeet P Borole; Spyros G Pavlostathis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Acetate oxidation by syntrophic association between Geobacter sulfurreducens and a hydrogen-utilizing exoelectrogen.

Authors:  Zen-ichiro Kimura; Satoshi Okabe
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.