Literature DB >> 26964992

Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position.

Jeong Jin Min1, Jong-Hwan Lee2, Kwan Young Hong1, Soo Joo Choi1.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of stroke volume variation (SVV) derived from NICOM® to predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position. Forty adult patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position were included in this study. We measured SVV from NICOM® (SVVNICOM) and FloTrac™/Vigileo™ systems (SVVVigileo), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) using automatic (PPVauto) and manual (PPVmanual) calculations at four time points including supine and prone positions, and before and after fluid loading of 6 ml kg-1 colloid solution. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in the cardiac index from Vigileo™ of ≥12 %. There were 19 responders and 21 non-responders. Prone positioning induced a significant decrease in SVVNICOM, SVVVigileo, PPVauto, and PPVmanual. However, all of these parameters successfully predicted fluid responsiveness in the prone position with area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves for SVVNICOM, SVVVigileo, PPVauto, and PPVmanual of 0.78 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.90, P = 0.0001], 0.79 (95 % CI 0.63-0.90, P = 0.0001), 0.76 (95 % CI 0.6-0.88, P = 0.0006), and 0.84 (95 % CI 0.69-0.94, P < 0.0001), respectively. The optimal cut-off values were 12 % for SVVNICOM, SVVVigileo, and PPVauto, and 10 % for PPVmanual. SVV from NICOM® successfully predicts fluid responsiveness during surgery in the prone position. This totally non-invasive technique for assessing individual functional intravenous volume status would be useful in a wide range of surgeries performed in the prone position.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Fluids therapy; Heart; Intraoperative; Monitoring; Prone position; Spinal surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26964992     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9859-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  34 in total

Review 1.  Positioning on surgical table.

Authors:  Claudio Schonauer; Antonio Bocchetti; Giuseppe Barbagallo; Vincenzo Albanese; Aldo Moraci
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices.

Authors:  X Monnet; M Dres; A Ferré; G Le Teuff; M Jozwiak; A Bleibtreu; M-C Le Deley; D Chemla; C Richard; J-L Teboul
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients.

Authors:  E Kupersztych-Hagege; J-L Teboul; A Artigas; A Talbot; C Sabatier; C Richard; X Monnet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean Pierre Goarin; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Benoît Tavernier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  M Biais; O Bernard; J C Ha; C Degryse; F Sztark
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Indications and complications of arterial catheter use in surgical or medical intensive care units: analysis of 4932 patients.

Authors:  E E Frezza; H Mezghebe
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Juliette Slieker; Olivier Desebbe; Christian Bauer; Pascal Chiari; Roland Hénaine; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Cardiac output monitoring: comparison of a new arterial pressure waveform analysis to the bolus thermodilution technique in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Rajesh Kumar Chand; Ravindra Sawhney; Milind Bhise; Ajmer Singh; Naresh Trehan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Comparison of monitoring performance of Bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Dominique Rotcajg; Dominique Denjean; Philippe Estagnasie; Alain Brusset
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Effect of head rotation on cerebral blood velocity in the prone position.

Authors:  Jakob Højlund; Marie Sandmand; Morten Sonne; Teit Mantoni; Henrik L Jørgensen; Bo Belhage; Johannes J van Lieshout; Frank C Pott
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-09-05
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Pre-anesthetic stroke volume variation can predict cardiac output decrease and hypotension during induction of general anesthesia.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Sayaka Tsujimoto; Shigemune Kuwata; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Yi; Zhongqiang Liu; Lina Qiao; Chaomin Wan; Dezhi Mu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pressure-controlled ventilation could decrease intraoperative blood loss and improve airway pressure measures during lumbar discectomy in the prone position: A comparison with volume-controlled ventilation mode.

Authors:  Amir Abouzkry El-Sayed; Sherif Kamal Arafa; Ayman Mohamady El-Demerdash
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

5.  Changes in stroke volume induced by lung recruitment maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness during intraoperative lung-protective ventilation in prone position.

Authors:  Ryota Watanabe; Koichi Suehiro; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Comparison of Noninvasive Dynamic Indices of Fluid Responsiveness Among Different Ventilation Modes in Dogs Recovering from Experimental Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Kazumasu Sasaki; Tatsushi Mutoh; Shuzo Yamamoto; Yasuyuki Taki; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-10-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.