Literature DB >> 18349192

The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room.

Maxime Cannesson1, Juliette Slieker, Olivier Desebbe, Christian Bauer, Pascal Chiari, Roland Hénaine, Jean-Jacques Lehot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure (deltaPP(man)) are accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. However, they cannot be continuously monitored. In our study, we assessed the clinical utility of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of deltaPP (deltaPP(auto)).
METHODS: We studied 25 patients referred for coronary artery bypass grafting. DeltaPP(auto) was continuously displayed using a method based on automatic detection algorithms, kernel smoothing, and rank-order filters. All patients were under general anesthesia, mechanical ventilation, and were also monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter. DeltaPP(man) and deltaPP(auto) were recorded simultaneously at eight steps during surgery including before and after intravascular volume expansion (500 mL hetastarch). Responders to volume expansion were defined as patients whose cardiac index increased by more than 15% after volume expansion.
RESULTS: Agreement between deltaPP(man) and deltaPP(auto) over the 200 pairs of collected data was 0.7% +/- 3.4% (mean bias +/- SD). Seventeen patients were responders to volume expansion. A threshold deltaPP(man) value of 12% allowed discrimination of responders to volume expansion with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 100%. A threshold deltaPP(auto) value of 10% allowed discrimination of responders to volume expansion with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 88%.
CONCLUSION: DeltaPP(auto) is strongly correlated to deltaPP(man) is an accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness, and allows continuous monitoring of deltaPP. This novel algorithm has potential clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349192     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000297291.01615.5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  28 in total

1.  Relations between respiratory changes in R-wave amplitude and arterial pulse pressure in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Geoffray Keller; Olivier Desebbe; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Visual estimation of pulse pressure variation is not reliable: a randomized simulation study.

Authors:  Joseph Rinehart; Tanzeem Islam; Rob Boud; Allison Nguyen; Brenton Alexander; Cecilia Canales; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose.

Authors:  Zhiyong He; Hui Qiao; Wei Zhou; Yun Wang; Zhendong Xu; Xuehua Che; Jun Zhang; Weimin Liang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Accuracy of automated continuous calculation of pulse pressure variation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yazine Mahjoub; Emmanuel Lorne; Yannick Micaux; Mélanie Levrard; Norair Airapetian; Mustapha Hijazi; Nassim Ammenouche; François Tinturier; Hervé Dupont
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  A pilot study of the pleth variability index as an indicator of volume-responsive hypotension in newborn infants during surgery.

Authors:  Soyhan Bagci; Nicole Müller; Andreas Müller; Andreas Heydweiller; Peter Bartmann; Axel R Franz
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position.

Authors:  Jeong Jin Min; Jong-Hwan Lee; Kwan Young Hong; Soo Joo Choi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Respiratory variation in peak aortic velocity accurately predicts fluid responsiveness in children undergoing neurosurgery under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Kavita G Morparia; Srijaya K Reddy; Laura J Olivieri; Michael C Spaeder; Jennifer J Schuette
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Pulse pressure variation and volume responsiveness during acutely increased pulmonary artery pressure: an experimental study.

Authors:  Fritz Daudel; David Tüller; Stefanie Krähenbühl; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Laurent Muller; Guillaume Louart; Philippe-Jean Bousquet; Damien Candela; Lana Zoric; Jean-Emmanuel de La Coussaye; Samir Jaber; Jean-Yves Lefrant
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.