Literature DB >> 20190260

Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery.

M Biais1, O Bernard, J C Ha, C Degryse, F Sztark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) are robust indicators of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated supine patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of PPV and SVV to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the prone position (PP) during scoliosis surgery.
METHODS: Thirty subjects were studied after the induction of anaesthesia in the supine position [before and after volume expansion (VE) with 500 ml of hetastarch 6%] and in PP (immediately after PP and before and after VE). PPV, SVV, cardiac output (CO), and static compliance of the respiratory system were recorded at each interval. Subjects were defined as responders (Rs) to VE if CO increased > or =15%.
RESULTS: Three subjects were excluded. In the supine position, 16 subjects were Rs. PPV and SVV before VE were correlated with VE-induced changes in CO (r(2)=0.64, P<0.0001 and r(2)=0.56, P<0.0001, respectively). Fluid responsiveness was predicted by PPV >11% (sensitivity=88%, specificity=82%) and by SVV >9% (sensitivity=88%, specificity=91%). PP induced an increase in PPV and SVV (P<0.0001) and a decrease in the static compliance of the respiratory system (P<0.0001). In PP, 17 patients were Rs. PPV and SVV before VE were correlated with VE-induced changes in CO (r(2)=0.59, P<0.0001 and r(2)=0.55, P<0.0005, respectively). Fluid responsiveness was predicted in PP by PPV >15% (sensitivity=100%, specificity=80%) and by SVV >14% (sensitivity=94%, specificity=80%).
CONCLUSIONS: PP induces a significant increase in PPV and SVV but does not alter their abilities to predict fluid responsiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190260     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  31 in total

1.  Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose.

Authors:  Zhiyong He; Hui Qiao; Wei Zhou; Yun Wang; Zhendong Xu; Xuehua Che; Jun Zhang; Weimin Liang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  The ability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system to measure cardiac output and track cardiac output changes during one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Tadashi Matsuura; Takashi Mori; Tomoharu Funao; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position.

Authors:  Jeong Jin Min; Jong-Hwan Lee; Kwan Young Hong; Soo Joo Choi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Min Hur; Seokha Yoo; Jung-Yoon Choi; Sun-Kyung Park; Dhong Eun Jung; Won Ho Kim; Jin-Tae Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in the beach chair position using dynamic preload indices.

Authors:  Su Hyun Lee; Yong-Min Chun; Young Jun Oh; Seokyung Shin; Sang Jun Park; Soo Young Kim; Yong Seon Choi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Arterial Pressure Variation in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Identifying Reference Distributions and Modifying Factors.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Stroke volume-directed administration of hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) and Ringer’s acetate in prone position during neurosurgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ann-Christine Lindroos; Tomohisa Niiya; Tarja Randell; Tomi T Niemi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  The use of pulse pressure variation for predicting impairment of microcirculatory blood flow.

Authors:  Christoph R Behem; Michael F Graessler; Till Friedheim; Rahel Kluttig; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Anna Duprée; E Sebastian Debus; Daniel A Reuter; Sabine H Wipper; Constantin J C Trepte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Recent advance in patient monitoring.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-09-20

10.  Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine and phenylephrine bolus injection in patients in the prone position under general anesthesia for lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jiangyan Xia; Yongying Sun; Jing Yuan; Xinjian Lu; Zhendan Peng; Ning Yin
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.