Literature DB >> 26937709

Image Noise, CNR, and Detectability of Low-Contrast, Low-Attenuation Liver Lesions in a Phantom: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Phantom Size, Integrated Circuit Detector, and Iterative Reconstruction.

Ajit H Goenka1, Brian R Herts1, Frank Dong1, Nancy A Obuchowski1, Andrew N Primak1, Wadih Karim1, Mark E Baker1.   

Abstract

Purpose To assess image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and detectability of low-contrast, low-attenuation liver lesions in a semianthropomorphic phantom by using either a discrete circuit (DC) detector and filtered back projection (FBP) or an integrated circuit (IC) detector and iterative reconstruction (IR) with changes in radiation exposure and phantom size. Materials and Methods An anthropomorphic phantom without or with a 5-cm-thick fat-mimicking ring (widths, 30 and 40 cm) containing liver inserts with four spherical lesions was scanned with five exposure settings on each of two computed tomography scanners, one equipped with a DC detector and the other with an IC detector. Images from the DC and IC detector scanners were reconstructed with FBP and IR, respectively. Image noise and lesion CNR were measured. Four radiologists evaluated lesion presence on a five-point diagnostic confidence scale. Data analyses included receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and noninferiority analysis. Results The combination of IC and IR significantly reduced image noise (P < .001) (with the greatest reduction in the 40-cm phantom and at lower exposures) and improved lesion CNR (P < .001). There was no significant difference in area under the ROC curve between detector-reconstruction combinations at fixed exposure for either phantom. Reader accuracy with IC-IR was noninferior at 50% (100 mAs [effective]) and 25% (300 mAs [effective]) exposure reduction for the 30- and 40-cm phantoms, respectively (adjusted P < .001 and .04 respectively). IC-IR improved readers' confidence in the presence of a lesion (P = .029) independent of phantom size or exposure level. Conclusion IC-IR improved objective image quality and lesion detection confidence but did not result in superior diagnostic accuracy when compared with DC-FBP. Moderate exposure reductions maintained comparable diagnostic accuracy for both detector-reconstruction combinations. Lesion detection in the 40-cm phantom was inferior at smaller exposure reduction than in the 30-cm phantom. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26937709     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Aortic CT angiography using the double region of interest timing bolus technique: feasibility of 80 kVp scanning in lean patients.

Authors:  Nobuo Tomizawa; Shingo Ito; Tastuya Nakao; Hiroaki Arakawa; Kodai Yamamoto; Shinichi Inoh; Takeshi Nojo; Sunao Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Impact of advanced detector technology and iterative reconstruction on low-dose quantitative assessment of lung computed tomography density in a biological lung model.

Authors:  E Hammond; K S Chan; J C Ames; N Stoyles; C M Sloan; J Guo; J D Newell; E A Hoffman; J C Sieren
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Observer Performance with Varying Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Methods for Detection of Hepatic Metastases.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; Jeff L Fidler; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; David M Hough; Naoki Takahashi; Lifeng Yu; Matthew Johnson; Shuai Leng; David R Holmes; Rickey Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Application of 80-kVp scan and raw data-based iterative reconstruction for reduced iodine load abdominal-pelvic CT in patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy referred for oncological assessment: effects on radiation dose, image quality and renal function.

Authors:  Yasunori Nagayama; Shota Tanoue; Akinori Tsuji; Joji Urata; Mitsuhiro Furusawa; Seitaro Oda; Takeshi Nakaura; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Eri Yoshida; Morikatsu Yoshida; Masafumi Kidoh; Machiko Tateishi; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Determination of iodine detectability in different types of multiple-energy images for a photon-counting detector computed tomography system.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Gregory Michalak; Jayse Weaver; Andrea Ferrero; Hao Gong; Kenneth A Fetterly; Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-15

6.  Improving the image quality of pediatric chest CT angiography with low radiation dose and contrast volume using deep learning image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jihang Sun; Haoyan Li; Jianying Li; Tong Yu; Michelle Li; Zuofu Zhou; Yun Peng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07

7.  Can visual analogue scale be used in radiologic subjective image quality assessment?

Authors:  Kathrine Rydén Suther; Einar Hopp; Bjarne Smevik; Arnt Eltvedt Fiane; Harald Lauritz Lindberg; Stig Larsen; Charlotte de Lange
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-07-04

8.  Simultaneous Image Reconstruction and Element Decomposition for Iodine Contrast Agent Visualization in Multienergy Element-Resolved Cone Beam CT.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Hyunuk Jung; Ming Yang; Chenyang Shen; Xun Jia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  A Universal Protocol for Abdominal CT Examinations Performed on a Photon-Counting Detector CT System: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Gregory J Michalak; Jayse M Weaver; Hao Gong; Lifeng Yu; Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 10.065

10.  Can iterative reconstruction algorithms replace tube loading compensation in low kVp hepatic CT? Subjective versus objective image quality.

Authors:  Fredrik Holmquist; Marcus Söderberg; Ulf Nyman; Tobias Fält; Roger Siemund; Mats Geijer
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2020-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.