Literature DB >> 34249634

Improving the image quality of pediatric chest CT angiography with low radiation dose and contrast volume using deep learning image reconstruction.

Jihang Sun1, Haoyan Li1, Jianying Li2, Tong Yu1, Michelle Li3, Zuofu Zhou4, Yun Peng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chest CT angiography (CTA) is a common clinical examination technique for children. Iterative reconstruction algorithms are often used to reduce image noise but encounter limitations under low dose conditions. Deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms have been developed to overcome these limitations. We assessed the quantitative and qualitative image quality of thin-slice chest CTA in children acquired with low radiation dose and contrast volume by using a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm.
METHODS: A total of 33 children underwent chest CTA with 70 kVp and automatic tube current modulation for noise indices of 11-15 based on their age and contrast volume of 0.8-1.2 mL/kg. Images were reconstructed with 50% and 100% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) and high-setting DLIR (DLIR-H) at 0.625 mm slice thickness. Two radiologists evaluated images in consensus for overall image noise, artery margin, and artery contrast separately on a 5-point scale (5, excellent; 4, good; 3, acceptable; 2, sub-acceptable, and 1, not acceptable). The CT value and image noise of the descending aorta and back muscle were measured. Radiation dose and contrast volume was recorded.
RESULTS: The volume CT dose index, dose length product, and contrast volume were 1.37±0.29 mGy, 35.43±10.59 mGy·cm, and 25.43±13.32 mL, respectively. The image noises (in HU) of the aorta with DLIR-H (19.24±5.77) and 100% ASIR-V (20.45±6.93) were not significantly different (P>0.05) and were substantially lower than 50% ASIR-V (29.45±7.59) (P<0.001). The 100% ASIR-V images had over-smoothed artery margins, but only the DLIR-H images provided acceptable scores on all 3 aspects of the qualitative image quality evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to improve the image quality of a low radiation dose and contrast volume chest CTA in children using the high-setting DLIR algorithm. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tomography; X-ray computed; deep learning; image reconstruction; pediatric; thorax

Year:  2021        PMID: 34249634      PMCID: PMC8250028          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-1158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  23 in total

1.  The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology. August 18-19, 2001.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-06

2.  State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques.

Authors:  Lucas L Geyer; U Joseph Schoepf; Felix G Meinel; John W Nance; Gorka Bastarrika; Jonathon A Leipsic; Narinder S Paul; Marco Rengo; Andrea Laghi; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Joël Greffier; Aymeric Hamard; Fabricio Pereira; Corinne Barrau; Hugo Pasquier; Jean Paul Beregi; Julien Frandon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Advantages of 70-kV CT Angiography for the Visualization of the Adamkiewicz Artery: Comparison with 120-kV Imaging.

Authors:  S Shimoyama; T Nishii; Y Watanabe; A K Kono; K Kagawa; S Takahashi; K Sugimura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Pediatric thoracic CT angiography at 70 kV: a phantom study to investigate the effects on image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Robert D MacDougall; Patricia L Kleinman; Lifeng Yu; Edward Y Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-03-17

6.  Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second- versus a third-generation dual-source CT system.

Authors:  Mathias Meyer; Holger Haubenreisser; U Joseph Schoepf; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Christianne Leidecker; Thomas Allmendinger; Ralf Lehmann; Sonja Sudarski; Martin Borggrefe; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness.

Authors:  Chankue Park; Ki Seok Choo; Yunsub Jung; Hee Seok Jeong; Jae-Yeon Hwang; Mi Sook Yun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Image quality in CT: From physical measurements to model observers.

Authors:  F R Verdun; D Racine; J G Ott; M J Tapiovaara; P Toroi; F O Bochud; W J H Veldkamp; A Schegerer; R W Bouwman; I Hernandez Giron; N W Marshall; S Edyvean
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Impact of preset and postset adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on image quality in nonenhanced abdominal-pelvic CT on wide-detector revolution CT.

Authors:  Zheng Zhu; Yanfeng Zhao; Xinming Zhao; Xiaoyi Wang; Weijun Yu; Mancang Hu; Xuan Zhang; Chunwu Zhou
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-01

10.  Deep learning reconstruction versus iterative reconstruction for cardiac CT angiography in a stroke imaging protocol: reduced radiation dose and improved image quality.

Authors:  Angélique Bernard; Pierre-Olivier Comby; Brivaël Lemogne; Karim Haioun; Frédéric Ricolfi; Olivier Chevallier; Romaric Loffroy
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  The influence of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on the image quality and auto-analysis of pulmonary nodules at ultra-low dose chest CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Xiaohui Li; Lei Deng; Yue Yao; Baobin Guo; Jianying Li; Quanxin Yang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-05

2.  Deep learning image reconstruction in pediatric abdominal and chest computed tomography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Kun Zhang; Xiang Shi; Shuang-Shuang Xie; Ji-Hang Sun; Zhuo-Heng Liu; Shuai Zhang; Jia-Yang Song; Wen Shen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

3.  Comparison of Application Value of Different Radiation Dose Evaluation Methods in Evaluating Radiation Dose of Adult Thoracic and Abdominal CT Scan.

Authors:  Jimin He; Guanwei Dong; Yi Deng; Jun He; ZhiGang Xiu; Fanzi Feng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence for Radiation Dose Optimization in Pediatric Radiology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Curtise K C Ng
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14

5.  Deep-learning image reconstruction for image quality evaluation and accurate bone mineral density measurement on quantitative CT: A phantom-patient study.

Authors:  Yali Li; Yaojun Jiang; Xi Yu; Binbin Ren; Chunyu Wang; Sihui Chen; Duoshan Ma; Danyang Su; Huilong Liu; Xiangyang Ren; Xiaopeng Yang; Jianbo Gao; Yan Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.055

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.