Literature DB >> 30204077

Observer Performance with Varying Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Methods for Detection of Hepatic Metastases.

Joel G Fletcher1, Jeff L Fidler1, Sudhakar K Venkatesh1, David M Hough1, Naoki Takahashi1, Lifeng Yu1, Matthew Johnson1, Shuai Leng1, David R Holmes1, Rickey Carter1, Cynthia H McCollough1.   

Abstract

Purpose To estimate the ability of lower dose levels and iterative reconstruction (IR) to display hepatic metastases that can be detected by radiologists. Materials and Methods Projection data from 83 contrast agent-enhanced CT examinations were collected. Metastases were defined by histopathologic analysis or progression and regression. Lower radiation dose configurations were reconstructed at five dose levels with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR (automatic exposure control settings: 80, 100, 120, 160, and 200 quality reference mAs [QRM]). Three abdominal radiologists circumscribed metastases, indicating confidence (confidence range, 0-100) and image quality. Noninferiority was assessed by using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis (noninferiority limit, -0.10) and reader agreement rules, which required identification of metastases identified at routine dose, and no nonlesion localizations in patients negative for metastases, in 71 or more patient CT examinations (of 83), for each configuration. Results There were 123 hepatic metastases (mean size, 1.4 cm; median volume CT dose index and size-specific dose estimate, 11.0 and 13.4 mGy, respectively). By using JAFROC figure of merit, 100 QRM FBP did not meet noninferiority criteria and had estimated performance difference from routine dose of -0.08 (95% confidence interval: -0.11, -0.04). Preset reader agreement rules were not met for 100 QRM IR or 80 QRM IR, but were met for doses 120 QRM or higher (ie, size-specific dose estimate ≥ 8.0 mGy). IR improved image quality (P < .05) but not reader performance. Other than 160 QRM IR, lower dose levels were associated with reduced confidence in metastasis detection (P < .001). Conclusion For detection of hepatic metastases by using contrast-enhanced CT, dose levels that corresponded to 120 quality reference mAs (size-specific dose estimate, 8.0 mGy) and higher performed similarly to 200 quality reference mAs with filtered back projection. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30204077      PMCID: PMC6209061          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Iterative reconstruction reduces abdominal CT dose.

Authors:  Anne Catrine Trægde Martinsen; Hilde Kjernlie Sæther; Per Kristian Hol; Dag Rune Olsen; Per Skaane
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Noise-reducing algorithms do not necessarily provide superior dose optimisation for hepatic lesion detection with multidetector CT.

Authors:  K L Dobeli; S J Lewis; S R Meikle; D L Thiele; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver.

Authors:  Mark E Baker; Frank Dong; Andrew Primak; Nancy A Obuchowski; David Einstein; Namita Gandhi; Brian R Herts; Andrei Purysko; Erick Remer; Neil Vachhani; Neil Vachani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: an 18-reader study.

Authors:  Ajit H Goenka; Brian R Herts; Nancy A Obuchowski; Andrew N Primak; Frank Dong; Wadih Karim; Mark E Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

7.  Observer Performance in the Detection and Classification of Malignant Hepatic Nodules and Masses with CT Image-Space Denoising and Iterative Reconstruction.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; Lifeng Yu; Zhoubo Li; Armando Manduca; Daniel J Blezek; David M Hough; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Gregory C Brickner; Joseph C Cernigliaro; Amy K Hara; Jeff L Fidler; David S Lake; Maria Shiung; David Lewis; Shuai Leng; Kurt E Augustine; Rickey E Carter; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Suspected acute colon diverticulitis: imaging with low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Denis Tack; Pascale Bohy; Ingrid Perlot; Viviane De Maertelaer; Orfan Alkeilani; Stavroula Sourtzis; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.

Authors:  Justin Solomon; Daniele Marin; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Bhavik Patel; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Image Noise, CNR, and Detectability of Low-Contrast, Low-Attenuation Liver Lesions in a Phantom: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Phantom Size, Integrated Circuit Detector, and Iterative Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ajit H Goenka; Brian R Herts; Frank Dong; Nancy A Obuchowski; Andrew N Primak; Wadih Karim; Mark E Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of Lower-Dose Spiral Head CT for Detection of Intracranial Findings Causing Neurologic Deficits.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; D R DeLone; A L Kotsenas; N G Campeau; V T Lehman; L Yu; S Leng; D R Holmes; P K Edwards; M P Johnson; G J Michalak; R E Carter; C H McCollough
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Rapid measurement of the low contrast detectability of CT scanners.

Authors:  Akinyinka Omigbodun; J Y Vaishnav; Scott S Hsieh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluation of Pseudoreader Study Designs to Estimate Observer Performance Results as an Alternative to Fully Crossed, Multireader, Multicase Studies.

Authors:  Rickey E Carter; David R Holmes; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  A minimum SNR criterion for computed tomography object detection in the projection domain.

Authors:  Scott S Hsieh; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Nathan R Huber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Determination of iodine detectability in different types of multiple-energy images for a photon-counting detector computed tomography system.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Gregory Michalak; Jayse Weaver; Andrea Ferrero; Hao Gong; Kenneth A Fetterly; Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-15

6.  Observer Performance for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT over a Large Range of Radiation Dose Levels.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; David L Levin; Anne-Marie G Sykes; Rebecca M Lindell; Darin B White; Ronald S Kuzo; Vighnesh Suresh; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; David R Holmes; Akitoshi Inoue; Matthew P Johnson; Rickey E Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Masafumi Kaiume; Shigeru Suzuki; Koichiro Yasaka; Haruto Sugawara; Yun Shen; Yoshiaki Katada; Takuya Ishikawa; Rika Fukui; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Reader Performance as a Function of Patient Size for the Detection of Hepatic Metastases.

Authors:  Hao Gong; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Low-dose CT image and projection dataset.

Authors:  Taylor R Moen; Baiyu Chen; David R Holmes; Xinhui Duan; Zhicong Yu; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Quantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Xiaofei Yue; Qiqi Jiang; Xuehan Hu; Chunyuan Cen; Songlin Song; Kun Qian; Yuting Lu; Ming Yang; Qian Li; Ping Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.