Literature DB >> 26895421

Who Is Leading the Replication Fork, Pol ε or Pol δ?

Peter M J Burgers1, Dmitry Gordenin2, Thomas A Kunkel3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26895421      PMCID： PMC4838066          DOI： 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN： 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Dmitry A Gordenin; Carrie M Stith; Peter M J Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Ribose-seq: global mapping of ribonucleotides embedded in genomic DNA.

Authors:  Kyung Duk Koh; Sathya Balachander; Jay R Hesselberth; Francesca Storici
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  A Major Role of DNA Polymerase δ in Replication of Both the Leading and Lagging DNA Strands.

Authors:  Robert E Johnson; Roland Klassen; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Dividing the workload at a eukaryotic replication fork.

Authors:  Thomas A Kunkel; Peter M Burgers
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  Mechanism of asymmetric polymerase assembly at the eukaryotic replication fork.

Authors:  Roxana E Georgescu; Lance Langston; Nina Y Yao; Olga Yurieva; Dan Zhang; Jeff Finkelstein; Tani Agarwal; Mike E O'Donnell
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Tracking replication enzymology in vivo by genome-wide mapping of ribonucleotide incorporation.

Authors:  Anders R Clausen; Scott A Lujan; Adam B Burkholder; Clinton D Orebaugh; Jessica S Williams; Maryam F Clausen; Ewa P Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; David C Fargo; Duncan J Smith; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 15.369

7.  Replicative DNA polymerase δ but not ε proofreads errors in Cis and in Trans.

Authors:  Carrie L Flood; Gina P Rodriguez; Gaobin Bao; Arthur H Shockley; Yoke Wah Kow; Gray F Crouse
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Lagging-strand replication shapes the mutational landscape of the genome.

Authors:  Martin A M Reijns; Harriet Kemp; James Ding; Sophie Marion de Procé; Andrew P Jackson; Martin S Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A global profile of replicative polymerase usage.

Authors:  Yasukazu Daigaku; Andrea Keszthelyi; Carolin A Müller; Izumi Miyabe; Tony Brooks; Renata Retkute; Mike Hubank; Conrad A Nieduszynski; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition.

Authors:  Scott A Lujan; Anders R Clausen; Alan B Clark; Heather K MacAlpine; David M MacAlpine; Ewa P Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Adam B Burkholder; David C Fargo; Dmitry A Gordenin; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 9.043
  10 in total
  20 in total

1.  CMG-Pol epsilon dynamics suggests a mechanism for the establishment of leading-strand synthesis in the eukaryotic replisome.

Authors:  Jin Chuan Zhou; Agnieszka Janska; Panchali Goswami; Ludovic Renault; Ferdos Abid Ali; Abhay Kotecha; John F X Diffley; Alessandro Costa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quality control mechanisms exclude incorrect polymerases from the eukaryotic replication fork.

Authors:  Grant D Schauer; Michael E O'Donnell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Structure and function relationships in mammalian DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Nicole M Hoitsma; Amy M Whitaker; Matthew A Schaich; Mallory R Smith; Max S Fairlamb; Bret D Freudenthal
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Architecture of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Replisome.

Authors:  Lin Bai; Zuanning Yuan; Jingchuan Sun; Roxana Georgescu; Michael E O'Donnell; Huilin Li
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Alterations in cellular metabolism triggered by URA7 or GLN3 inactivation cause imbalanced dNTP pools and increased mutagenesis.

Authors:  Tobias T Schmidt; Gloria Reyes; Kerstin Gries; Cemile Ümran Ceylan; Sushma Sharma; Matthias Meurer; Michael Knop; Andrei Chabes; Hans Hombauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Eukaryotic DNA Replication Fork.

Authors:  Peter M J Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 7.  DNA Polymerases Divide the Labor of Genome Replication.

Authors:  Scott A Lujan; Jessica S Williams; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 20.808

8.  Proficient Replication of the Yeast Genome by a Viral DNA Polymerase.

Authors:  Joseph L Stodola; Carrie M Stith; Peter M Burgers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  POLD1: Central mediator of DNA replication and repair, and implication in cancer and other pathologies.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Nicolas; Erica A Golemis; Sanjeevani Arora
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Human mismatch repair system balances mutation rates between strands by removing more mismatches from the lagging strand.

Authors:  Maria A Andrianova; Georgii A Bazykin; Sergey I Nikolaev; Vladimir B Seplyarskiy
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 9.043
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.