Literature DB >> 26880257

Levels of naturally occurring gamma radiation measured in British homes and their prediction in particular residences.

G M Kendall1, R Wakeford2, M Athanson3, T J Vincent4, E J Carter5, N P McColl6, M P Little7.   

Abstract

Gamma radiation from natural sources (including directly ionising cosmic rays) is an important component of background radiation. In the present paper, indoor measurements of naturally occurring gamma rays that were undertaken as part of the UK Childhood Cancer Study are summarised, and it is shown that these are broadly compatible with an earlier UK National Survey. The distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose rates in Great Britain is approximately normal with mean 96 nGy/h and standard deviation 23 nGy/h. Directly ionising cosmic rays contribute about one-third of the total. The expanded dataset allows a more detailed description than previously of indoor gamma-ray exposures and in particular their geographical variation. Various strategies for predicting indoor natural background gamma-ray dose rates were explored. In the first of these, a geostatistical model was fitted, which assumes an underlying geologically determined spatial variation, superimposed on which is a Gaussian stochastic process with Matérn correlation structure that models the observed tendency of dose rates in neighbouring houses to correlate. In the second approach, a number of dose-rate interpolation measures were first derived, based on averages over geologically or administratively defined areas or using distance-weighted averages of measurements at nearest-neighbour points. Linear regression was then used to derive an optimal linear combination of these interpolation measures. The predictive performances of the two models were compared via cross-validation, using a randomly selected 70 % of the data to fit the models and the remaining 30 % to test them. The mean square error (MSE) of the linear-regression model was lower than that of the Gaussian-Matérn model (MSE 378 and 411, respectively). The predictive performance of the two candidate models was also evaluated via simulation; the OLS model performs significantly better than the Gaussian-Matérn model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childhood cancer; Gamma radiation; Leukaemia; Natural background radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26880257     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-016-0635-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  21 in total

1.  Flexible dose-response models for Japanese atomic bomb survivor data: Bayesian estimation and prediction of cancer risk.

Authors:  James Bennett; Mark P Little; Sylvia Richardson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Mapping variation in radon potential both between and within geological units.

Authors:  J C H Miles; J D Appleton
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.394

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  A Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method for estimating uncertainty arising from shared errors in exposures in epidemiological studies of nuclear workers.

Authors:  Leslie Stayner; Martine Vrijheid; Elisabeth Cardis; Daniel O Stram; Isabelle Deltour; Stephen J Gilbert; Geoffrey Howe
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Spatial variation of natural radiation and childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain.

Authors:  S Richardson; C Monfort; M Green; G Draper; C Muirhead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995 Nov 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  C E Land
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The risk of childhood leukaemia following exposure to ionising radiation--a review.

Authors:  Richard Wakeford
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 1.394

8.  A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980-2006.

Authors:  G M Kendall; M P Little; R Wakeford; K J Bunch; J C H Miles; T J Vincent; J R Meara; M F G Murphy
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Evaluation of indoor gamma radiation dose in dwellings.

Authors:  Marcelo Francis Máduar; Goro Hiromoto
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 10.  Risk factors for acute leukemia in children: a review.

Authors:  Martin Belson; Beverely Kingsley; Adrianne Holmes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modelling the bimodal distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates in Great Britain.

Authors:  G M Kendall; P Chernyavskiy; J D Appleton; J C H Miles; R Wakeford; M Athanson; T J Vincent; N P McColl; M P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for identifying posterior element bone stress injury in athletes with low back pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Roy Esh; Linn Helen J Grødahl; Robert Kerslake; Kate Strachan; Simon Spencer; Louise Fawcett; Alison Rushton; Nicola R Heneghan
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-10-02

3.  Spatial prediction of naturally occurring gamma radiation in Great Britain.

Authors:  P Chernyavskiy; G M Kendall; R Wakeford; M P Little
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 4.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Residential Exposure to Natural Background Radiation and Risk of Childhood Acute Leukemia in France, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Claire Demoury; Fabienne Marquant; Géraldine Ielsch; Stéphanie Goujon; Christophe Debayle; Laure Faure; Astrid Coste; Olivier Laurent; Jérôme Guillevic; Dominique Laurier; Denis Hémon; Jacqueline Clavel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Risk Factors for Childhood Leukemia: Radiation and Beyond.

Authors:  Janine-Alison Schmidt; Sabine Hornhardt; Friederike Erdmann; Isidro Sánchez-García; Ute Fischer; Joachim Schüz; Gunde Ziegelberger
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.