Literature DB >> 22766784

A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980-2006.

G M Kendall1, M P Little, R Wakeford, K J Bunch, J C H Miles, T J Vincent, J R Meara, M F G Murphy.   

Abstract

We conducted a large record-based case-control study testing associations between childhood cancer and natural background radiation. Cases (27,447) born and diagnosed in Great Britain during 1980-2006 and matched cancer-free controls (36,793) were from the National Registry of Childhood Tumours. Radiation exposures were estimated for mother's residence at the child's birth from national databases, using the County District mean for gamma rays, and a predictive map based on domestic measurements grouped by geological boundaries for radon. There was 12% excess relative risk (ERR) (95% CI 3, 22; two-sided P=0.01) of childhood leukaemia per millisievert of cumulative red bone marrow dose from gamma radiation; the analogous association for radon was not significant, ERR 3% (95% CI -4, 11; P=0.35). Associations for other childhood cancers were not significant for either exposure. Excess risk was insensitive to adjustment for measures of socio-economic status. The statistically significant leukaemia risk reported in this reasonably powered study (power ~50%) is consistent with high-dose rate predictions. Substantial bias is unlikely, and we cannot identify mechanisms by which confounding might plausibly account for the association, which we regard as likely to be causal. The study supports the extrapolation of high-dose rate risk models to protracted exposures at natural background exposure levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766784      PMCID: PMC3998763          DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  24 in total

1.  Mapping variation in radon potential both between and within geological units.

Authors:  J C H Miles; J D Appleton
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.394

2.  Variations in radiation exposures of adults and children in the UK.

Authors:  G M Kendall; J S Hughes; W B Oatway; A L Jones
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.394

Review 3.  Infection, immune responses and the aetiology of childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  Mel Greaves
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Spatial variation of natural radiation and childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain.

Authors:  S Richardson; C Monfort; M Green; G Draper; C Muirhead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995 Nov 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Factors affecting indoor radon concentrations in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J A Gunby; S C Darby; J C Miles; B M Green; D R Cox
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 6.  Risk coefficients for childhood cancer after intrauterine irradiation: a review.

Authors:  R Wakeford; M P Little
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 7.  Indoor radon and childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Domestic radon and childhood cancer in Denmark.

Authors:  Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Claus E Andersen; Helle P Andersen; Peter Gravesen; Morten Lind; Joachim Schüz; Kaare Ulbak
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 9.  Risk factors for acute leukemia in children: a review.

Authors:  Martin Belson; Beverely Kingsley; Adrianne Holmes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study of exposure to domestic sources of ionising radiation: 2: gamma radiation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  A New Era of Low-Dose Radiation Epidemiology.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Preetha Rajaraman; Estelle Ntowe; Amy Berrington de González
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

2.  Levels of naturally occurring gamma radiation measured in British homes and their prediction in particular residences.

Authors:  G M Kendall; R Wakeford; M Athanson; T J Vincent; E J Carter; N P McColl; M P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Mutations and chromosomal aberrations in hMTH1-transfected and non-transfected TK6 cells after exposure to low dose rates of gamma radiation.

Authors:  Sara Shakeri Manesh; Marta Deperas-Kaminska; Asal Fotouhi; Traimate Sangsuwan; Mats Harms-Ringdahl; Andrzej Wojcik; Siamak Haghdoost
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Ethical Issues Related to the Promotion of a "100 mSv Threshold Assumption" in Japan after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident in 2011: Background and Consequences.

Authors:  Toshihide Tsuda; Lena Lindahl; Akiko Tokinobu
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  Risk Communication Strategies: Lessons Learned from Previous Disasters with a Focus on the Fukushima Radiation Accident.

Authors:  Erik R Svendsen; Ichiro Yamaguchi; Toshihide Tsuda; Jean Remy Davee Guimaraes; Martin Tondel
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-12

6.  Modelling the bimodal distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates in Great Britain.

Authors:  G M Kendall; P Chernyavskiy; J D Appleton; J C H Miles; R Wakeford; M Athanson; T J Vincent; N P McColl; M P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Point/Counterpoint: low-dose radiation is beneficial, not harmful.

Authors:  Mohan Doss; Mark P Little; Colin G Orton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Response to letter by Doss: addition of diagnostic CT scan does not increase the cancer risk in patients undergoing SPECT studies.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Elke A Nekolla
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Childhood leukemia in Ukraine after the Chornobyl accident.

Authors:  T F Liubarets; Y Shibata; V A Saenko; V G Bebeshko; A E Prysyazhnyuk; K M Bruslova; M M Fuzik; S Yamashita; D A Bazyka
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Potential impacts of radon, terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays on childhood leukemia in France: a quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  Olivier Laurent; Sophie Ancelet; David B Richardson; Denis Hémon; Géraldine Ielsch; Claire Demoury; Jacqueline Clavel; Dominique Laurier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.