Literature DB >> 30132159

Modelling the bimodal distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates in Great Britain.

G M Kendall1, P Chernyavskiy2,3, J D Appleton4, J C H Miles5, R Wakeford6, M Athanson7, T J Vincent8, N P McColl9, M P Little2.   

Abstract

Gamma radiation from naturally occurring sources (including directly ionizing cosmic-rays) is a major component of background radiation. An understanding of the magnitude and variation of doses from these sources is important, and the ability to predict them is required for epidemiological studies. In the present paper, indoor measurements of naturally occurring gamma-rays at representative locations in Great Britain are summarized. It is shown that, although the individual measurement data appear unimodal, the distribution of gamma-ray dose-rates when averaged over relatively small areas, which probably better represents the underlying distribution with inter-house variation reduced, appears bimodal. The dose-rate distributions predicted by three empirical and geostatistical models are also bimodal and compatible with the distributions of the areally averaged dose-rates. The distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates in the UK is compared with those in other countries, which also tend to appear bimodal (or possibly multimodal). The variation of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates with geology, socio-economic status of the area, building type, and period of construction are explored. The factors affecting indoor dose-rates from background gamma radiation are complex and frequently intertwined, but geology, period of construction, and socio-economic status are influential; the first is potentially most influential, perhaps, because it can be used as a general proxy for local building materials. Various statistical models are tested for predicting indoor gamma-ray dose-rates at unmeasured locations. Significant improvements over previous modelling are reported. The dose-rate estimates generated by these models reflect the imputed underlying distribution of dose-rates and provide acceptable predictions at geographical locations without measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childhood cancer; Gamma radiation; Leukaemia; Natural background radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30132159     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0752-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  22 in total

1.  Residential mobility and associated factors in relation to the assessment of exposure to naturally occurring radiation in studies of childhood cancer.

Authors:  G M Kendall; R Wakeford; K J Bunch; T J Vincent; M P Little
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.394

2.  Levels of naturally occurring gamma radiation measured in British homes and their prediction in particular residences.

Authors:  G M Kendall; R Wakeford; M Athanson; T J Vincent; E J Carter; N P McColl; M P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Calculation of the indoor gamma dose rate distribution due to building materials in the Netherlands.

Authors:  P de Jong; J W E van Dijk
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Background radiation and childhood leukemia: A nationwide register-based case-control study.

Authors:  Atte Nikkilä; Sini Erme; Hannu Arvela; Olli Holmgren; Jani Raitanen; Olli Lohi; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The relative radioactivity of building materials.

Authors:  E I Hamilton
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1971-06

6.  Comment on "Indoor terrestrial gamma dose rate mapping in France: A case study using two different geostatistical models" by Warnery et al. (J. Environ. Radioact. 2015, 139, 140-148).

Authors:  G M Kendall; M P Little; R Wakeford
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  Response to comment on "Indoor terrestrial gamma dose rate mapping in France: A case study using two different geostatistical models" by Warnery et al.

Authors:  F Marquant; C Demoury; G Ielsch; D Laurier; D Hémon; J Clavel
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980-2006.

Authors:  G M Kendall; M P Little; R Wakeford; K J Bunch; J C H Miles; T J Vincent; J R Meara; M F G Murphy
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Indoor terrestrial gamma dose rate mapping in France: a case study using two different geostatistical models.

Authors:  E Warnery; G Ielsch; C Lajaunie; E Cale; H Wackernagel; C Debayle; J Guillevic
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.674

10.  Residential Exposure to Natural Background Radiation and Risk of Childhood Acute Leukemia in France, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Claire Demoury; Fabienne Marquant; Géraldine Ielsch; Stéphanie Goujon; Christophe Debayle; Laure Faure; Astrid Coste; Olivier Laurent; Jérôme Guillevic; Dominique Laurier; Denis Hémon; Jacqueline Clavel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  Measurements and determinants of children's exposure to background gamma radiation in Switzerland.

Authors:  Christophe L Folly; Antonella Mazzei-Abba; Astrid Coste; Christian Kreis; Ben D Spycher
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.438

Review 2.  Risk Factors for Childhood Leukemia: Radiation and Beyond.

Authors:  Janine-Alison Schmidt; Sabine Hornhardt; Friederike Erdmann; Isidro Sánchez-García; Ute Fischer; Joachim Schüz; Gunde Ziegelberger
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-24

3.  Summary of Radiation Research Society Online 66th Annual Meeting, Symposium on "Epidemiology: Updates on epidemiological low dose studies," including discussion.

Authors:  Cato M Milder; Gerald M Kendall; Aryana Arsham; Helmut Schöllnberger; Richard Wakeford; Harry M Cullings; Mark P Little
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.694

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.