Literature DB >> 26858521

Facial averageness and genetic quality: Testing heritability, genetic correlation with attractiveness, and the paternal age effect.

Anthony J Lee1, Dorian G Mitchem2, Margaret J Wright3, Nicholas G Martin3, Matthew C Keller2, Brendan P Zietsch4.   

Abstract

Popular theory suggests that facial averageness is preferred in a partner for genetic benefits to offspring. However, whether facial averageness is associated with genetic quality is yet to be established. Here, we computed an objective measure of facial averageness for a large sample (N = 1,823) of identical and nonidentical twins and their siblings to test two predictions from the theory that facial averageness reflects genetic quality. First, we use biometrical modelling to estimate the heritability of facial averageness, which is necessary if it reflects genetic quality. We also test for a genetic association between facial averageness and facial attractiveness. Second, we assess whether paternal age at conception (a proxy of mutation load) is associated with facial averageness and facial attractiveness. Our findings are mixed with respect to our hypotheses. While we found that facial averageness does have a genetic component, and a significant phenotypic correlation exists between facial averageness and attractiveness, we did not find a genetic correlation between facial averageness and attractiveness (therefore, we cannot say that the genes that affect facial averageness also affect facial attractiveness) and paternal age at conception was not negatively associated with facial averageness. These findings support some of the previously untested assumptions of the 'genetic benefits' account of facial averageness, but cast doubt on others.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mate preference; developmental stability; good genes; mutation load; physical attractiveness; twins

Year:  2015        PMID: 26858521      PMCID: PMC4743547          DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Hum Behav        ISSN: 1090-5138            Impact factor:   4.178


  24 in total

1.  Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Yoshikawa; A Clark; K Lee; R McKay; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  It's not just average faces that are attractive: computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive.

Authors:  Jamin Halberstadt; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Sakiko Yoshikawa; Romina Palermo; Leigh W Simmons; Marianne Peters; Kieran Lee; Jamin Halberstadt; John R Crawford
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Coren L Apicella; Anthony C Little; Frank W Marlowe
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?

Authors:  Masashi Komori; Satoru Kawamura; Shigekazu Ishihara
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-04-25

Review 6.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Alicia M Purkey; Nicholas M Grebe; Gregory Carey; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Timothy C Bates; Rosalind Arden; John K Hewitt; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Brendan P Zietsch; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models.

Authors:  Matthew C Keller; Sarah E Medland; Laramie E Duncan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Genetic factors that increase male facial masculinity decrease facial attractiveness of female relatives.

Authors:  Anthony J Lee; Dorian G Mitchem; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-30

10.  Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Michael L Frigge; Gisli Masson; Soren Besenbacher; Patrick Sulem; Gisli Magnusson; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Adalbjorg Jonasdottir; Wendy S W Wong; Gunnar Sigurdsson; G Bragi Walters; Stacy Steinberg; Hannes Helgason; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Olafur Th Magnusson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Social interactions in different environments impacts and motivates reproductive displays in college students.

Authors:  J Wortham; A Miller
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-06-22

2.  Genome-wide association study reveals sex-specific genetic architecture of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Bowen Hu; Ning Shen; James J Li; Hyunseung Kang; Jinkuk Hong; Jason Fletcher; Jan Greenberg; Marsha R Mailick; Qiongshi Lu
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  Genes influence facial attractiveness through intricate biological relationships.

Authors:  Julie D White; David A Puts
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  The Effects of Pitch Manipulation on Male Ratings of Female Speakers and Their Voices.

Authors:  Christina Krumpholz; Cliodhna Quigley; Karsan Ameen; Christoph Reuter; Leonida Fusani; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-07

5.  Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color.

Authors:  Tomáš Kočnar; S Adil Saribay; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.