Literature DB >> 12747502

It's not just average faces that are attractive: computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive.

Jamin Halberstadt1, Gillian Rhodes.   

Abstract

Average faces are attractive. We sought to distinguish whether this preference is an adaptation for finding high-quality mates (the direct selection account) or whether it reflects more general information-processing mechanisms. In three experiments, we examined the attractiveness of birds, fish, and automobiles whose averageness had been manipulated using digital image manipulation techniques common in research on facial attractiveness. Both manipulated averageness and rated averageness were strongly associated with attractiveness in all three stimulus categories. In addition, for birds and fish, but not for automobiles, the correlation between subjective averageness and attractiveness remained significant when the effect of subjective familiarity was partialled out. The results suggest that at least two mechanisms contribute to the attractiveness of average exemplars. One is a general preference for familiar stimuli, which contributes to the appeal of averageness in all three categories. The other is a preference for averageness per se, which was found for birds and fish, but not for automobiles, and may reflect a preference for features signaling genetic quality in living organisms, including conspecifics.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12747502     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health?

Authors:  G Rhodes; L A. Zebrowitz; A Clark; S M. Kalick; A Hightower; R McKay
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.178

2.  Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Yoshikawa; A Clark; K Lee; R McKay; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations.

Authors:  D Jones; K Hill
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

4.  Distinctiveness and expertise effects with homogeneous stimuli: towards a model of configural coding.

Authors:  G Rhodes; I G McLean
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: implications for mental representations of faces.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Brennan; S Carey
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Abstraction of visual patterns.

Authors:  J J Franks; J D Bransford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-09

7.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness.

Authors:  M R Cunningham; A P Barbee; C L Pike
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-07

8.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K J Lee; I Penton-Voak; D Rowland; S Yoshikawa; D M Burt; S P Henzi; D L Castles; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive?

Authors:  G Rhodes; C Hickford; L Jeffery
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-02

10.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K A May; S Yoshikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  17 in total

1.  Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces.

Authors:  Tim Valentine; Stephen Darling; Mary Donnelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

2.  Evolving attractive faces using morphing technology and a genetic algorithm: a new approach to determining ideal facial aesthetics.

Authors:  Brian J F Wong; Koohyar Karimi; Zlatko Devcic; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio.

Authors:  Marzia Del Zotto; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Is better beautiful or is beautiful better? Exploring the relationship between beauty and category structure.

Authors:  Megan Sanders; Tyler Davis; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

5.  From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces.

Authors:  Chaitanya K Ryali; Stanny Goffin; Piotr Winkielman; Angela J Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  ANIMAL ANALOGIES IN FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF FACES.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Heather A Wadlinger; Victor X Luevano; Benjamin M White; Cai Xing; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2011-08

7.  Facial averageness and genetic quality: Testing heritability, genetic correlation with attractiveness, and the paternal age effect.

Authors:  Anthony J Lee; Dorian G Mitchem; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.178

8.  Nasolabial symmetry and esthetics in cleft lip and palate: analysis of 3D facial images.

Authors:  Dries J Desmedt; Thomas J Maal; Mette A Kuijpers; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  SHIFTING THE PROTOTYPE: EXPERIENCE WITH FACES INFLUENCES AFFECTIVE AND ATTRACTIVENESS PREFERENCES.

Authors:  Connor P Principe; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2012-02

10.  Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.