Literature DB >> 19394585

Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?

Masashi Komori1, Satoru Kawamura, Shigekazu Ishihara.   

Abstract

Effects of averageness and symmetry on the judgment of facial attractiveness were investigated using a generalized Procrustes method and multiple regression analyses. Participants (n=114) rated attractiveness of 96 photographs of faces with neutral expressions. Through a generalized Procrustes method, the faces and their mirror-reversed versions were represented as points on a hyperplane. Both averageness and symmetry of each individual were defined as distances on the plane. A multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of symmetry and averageness for each gender. For male faces, both symmetry and averageness affected attractiveness ratings positively , and there was no difference between the effects of averageness and symmetry. On the other hand, for female faces only averageness affected attractiveness, whereas symmetry did not. However, these effects were not large.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394585     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  17 in total

1.  From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces.

Authors:  Chaitanya K Ryali; Stanny Goffin; Piotr Winkielman; Angela J Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Facial averageness and genetic quality: Testing heritability, genetic correlation with attractiveness, and the paternal age effect.

Authors:  Anthony J Lee; Dorian G Mitchem; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.178

3.  Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning.

Authors:  Jelena Djordjevic; Arshed M Toma; Alexei I Zhurov; Stephen Richmond
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Yingjun Lu; Jingmei Wang; Ling Wang; Junli Wang; Jinliang Qin
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans.

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Nicholas Pound; Ian D Stephen; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Asymmetry assessment using cone beam CT. A Class I and Class II patient comparison.

Authors:  Matthew M Sievers; Brent E Larson; Philippe R Gaillard; Andrew Wey
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive.

Authors:  José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes; Marta Iglesias-Julios; Miguel Pita; Enrique Turiegano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions: evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Hui Shen; Desmond K P Chau; Jianpo Su; Ling-Li Zeng; Weixiong Jiang; Jufang He; Jintu Fan; Dewen Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Art or Science? An Evidence-Based Approach to Human Facial Beauty a Quantitative Analysis Towards an Informed Clinical Aesthetic Practice.

Authors:  Harpal Harrar; Simon Myers; Ali M Ghanem
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Preference for Averageness in Faces Does Not Generalize to Non-Human Primates.

Authors:  Olivia B Tomeo; Leslie G Ungerleider; Ning Liu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.