Literature DB >> 24379153

Genetic factors that increase male facial masculinity decrease facial attractiveness of female relatives.

Anthony J Lee1, Dorian G Mitchem, Margaret J Wright, Nicholas G Martin, Matthew C Keller, Brendan P Zietsch.   

Abstract

For women, choosing a facially masculine man as a mate is thought to confer genetic benefits to offspring. Crucial assumptions of this hypothesis have not been adequately tested. It has been assumed that variation in facial masculinity is due to genetic variation and that genetic factors that increase male facial masculinity do not increase facial masculinity in female relatives. We objectively quantified the facial masculinity in photos of identical (n = 411) and nonidentical (n = 782) twins and their siblings (n = 106). Using biometrical modeling, we found that much of the variation in male and female facial masculinity is genetic. However, we also found that masculinity of male faces is unrelated to their attractiveness and that facially masculine men tend to have facially masculine, less-attractive sisters. These findings challenge the idea that facially masculine men provide net genetic benefits to offspring and call into question this popular theoretical framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; good genes; immunocompetence-handicap principle; intralocus sexual conflict; pathogen; sexual dimorphism; sexually antagonistic selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379153      PMCID: PMC4205959          DOI: 10.1177/0956797613510724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  24 in total

1.  Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Janelle Chan; Leslie A Zebrowitz; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 3.  Intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans.

Authors:  Joshua M Tybur; Steven W Gangestad
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Alicia M Purkey; Nicholas M Grebe; Gregory Carey; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Timothy C Bates; Rosalind Arden; John K Hewitt; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Brendan P Zietsch; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models.

Authors:  Matthew C Keller; Sarah E Medland; Laramie E Duncan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans.

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Nicholas Pound; Ian D Stephen; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evolutionary behavioral genetics.

Authors:  Brendan P Zietsch; Teresa R de Candia; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2015-04

2.  Facial averageness and genetic quality: Testing heritability, genetic correlation with attractiveness, and the paternal age effect.

Authors:  Anthony J Lee; Dorian G Mitchem; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.178

3.  Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Alicia M Purkey; Nicholas M Grebe; Gregory Carey; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Timothy C Bates; Rosalind Arden; John K Hewitt; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Brendan P Zietsch; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Testing the mate-choice hypothesis of the female orgasm: disentangling traits and behaviours.

Authors:  James M Sherlock; Morgan J Sidari; Emily Ann Harris; Fiona Kate Barlow; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2016-10-25

5.  No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women's Hormonal Status.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Amanda C Hahn; Claire I Fisher; Hongyi Wang; Michal Kandrik; Chengyang Han; Vanessa Fasolt; Danielle Morrison; Anthony J Lee; Iris J Holzleitner; Kieran J O'Shea; S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-04-30

6.  No evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with women's sexual desire.

Authors:  Weiqing Zhang; Amanda C Hahn; Ziyi Cai; Anthony J Lee; Iris J Holzleitner; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An investigation of a novel broad autism phenotype: increased facial masculinity among parents of children on the autism spectrum.

Authors:  Diana Weiting Tan; Syed Zulqarnain Gilani; Gail A Alvares; Ajmal Mian; Andrew J O Whitehouse; Murray T Maybery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A broad autism phenotype expressed in facial morphology.

Authors:  Diana Weiting Tan; Murray T Maybery; Syed Zulqarnain Gilani; Gail A Alvares; Ajmal Mian; David Suter; Andrew J O Whitehouse
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 6.222

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.