Literature DB >> 18283931

Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers.

Coren L Apicella1, Anthony C Little, Frank W Marlowe.   

Abstract

Average faces possess traits that are common to a population. Preferences for averageness have been found in several types of study of both real and computer-manipulated faces. Such preferences have been proposed to be biologically based and thus should be found across human populations, though cross-cultural evidence to date has been limited. In this study we examined preferences for averageness in both the West and in an isolated hunter-gatherer society, the Hadza of Northern Tanzania in Africa. We show that averageness is generally preferred across faces and cultures, but there were no significant preferences for averageness in European faces by Hadza judges. The different visual experience of the two cultures may explain the differences in preferences. While Westerners have visual experience of both European and African faces, the Hadza are limited in their experience of European faces, potentially leading to a lack of preference for averageness in this group because of the lack of a representation of the 'norm' of European faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18283931     DOI: 10.1068/p5601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  20 in total

1.  Face adaptation in an isolated population of African hunter-gatherers: Exposure influences perception of other-ethnicity faces more than own-ethnicity faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Coren L Apicella
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

Review 2.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Facial averageness and genetic quality: Testing heritability, genetic correlation with attractiveness, and the paternal age effect.

Authors:  Anthony J Lee; Dorian G Mitchem; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.178

4.  More than just a pretty face? The relationship between immune function and perceived facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Summer Mengelkoch; Jeff Gassen; Marjorie L Prokosch; Gary W Boehm; Sarah E Hill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Coren L Apicella; Frank W Marlowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Coren L Apicella; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Eye of the beholder: Symmetry perception in social judgments based on whole body displays.

Authors:  Jennifer Rees Brown; Rick van der Zwan; Anna Brooks
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.