Literature DB >> 26851537

Interdependent Barriers to Providing Adolescents with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Qualitative Insights from Providers.

Molly K Murphy1, Cindy Stoffel2, Meghan Nolan2, Sadia Haider2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods are the most effective form of reversible contraception but are underutilized by adolescents. The purpose of this study was to identify the context-specific barriers to providing adolescents with LARC that are experienced by pediatricians, family medicine physicians, and advanced practice nurses (APNs). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND
INTERVENTIONS: Pediatricians, family medicine providers, and APNs (n = 16) who care for adolescents participated in semistructured qualitative interviews. Interview data were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pediatricians, family medicine physicians, and APNs self-reported attitudes and practices regarding LARC provision to adolescents.
RESULTS: Provider confidence in LARC, patient-centered counseling on LARC, and instrumental supports for LARC all work interdependently either in support of or in opposition to provision of LARC to adolescents. Low provider confidence in LARC for adolescents was characterized by confusion about LARC eligibility criteria and perceptions of LARC insertion as traumatic for adolescents. Patient-centered counseling on LARC required providers' ability to elicit patient priorities, highlight the advantages of LARC over other methods, and address patients' concerns about these methods. Instrumental support for LARC included provider training on LARC, access to and financial support for LARC devices, and opportunity to practice LARC insertion and counseling skills.
CONCLUSION: Although none of the identified essential components of LARC provision to adolescents exist in isolation, instrumental support like provider training on LARC and access to LARC devices have the most fundamental effect on the other components and on providers' attitudes and practices regarding LARC for adolescents.
Copyright © 2016 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Contraception; Long-acting reversible contraception; Qualitative; Teen pregnancy; Unintended pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26851537      PMCID: PMC4974172          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.01.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  23 in total

1.  Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City.

Authors:  Julia Potter; Susan E Rubin; Peter Sherman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  New york city physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Katie Davis; M Diane McKee
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Colleen McNicholas; Jennifer Mullersman; Christina M Buckel; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women.

Authors:  Kendra L Fleming; Abby Sokoloff; Tina R Raine
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Determinants of intrauterine contraception provision among US family physicians: a national survey of knowledge, attitudes and practice.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Jason Fletcher; Tara Stein; Penina Segall-Gutierrez; Marji Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Lori Frohwirth; Jenna Jerman; Ronna Popkin; Kathleen Ethier
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 1.814

8.  Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Maya Blum; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Philip D Darney; J Joseph Speidel; Michael Policar; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Counseling about IUDs: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Mithu Tharayil; Nora Anderson; Kessy Gbenedio; Allen Wittman; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-03-13

10.  Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Katherine J Hladky; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinician and Staff Perceptions of Barriers to Providing Contraception in Primary Care.

Authors:  Lauren Cowen; Scott G Hartman; Elizabeth Loomis; Sukanya Srinivasan; Christina Gasbarro; Jocelyn Young
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2019-02-08

2.  Are men ready to use thermal male contraception? Acceptability in two French populations: New fathers and new providers.

Authors:  Marie Amouroux; Roger Mieusset; Raoul Desbriere; Pierre Opinel; Gilles Karsenty; Marine Paci; Sara Fernandes; Blandine Courbiere; Jeanne Perrin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The only way is up: priorities for implementing long-acting antiretrovirals for HIV prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Delivette Castor; Kathrine Meyers; Shannon Allen
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.061

4.  Understanding the Acceptability of Subdermal Implants as a Possible New HIV Prevention Method: Multi-Stage Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Christine Tagliaferri Rael; Cody Lentz; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Rebecca Giguere; Curtis Dolezal; Daniel Feller; Richard T D'Aquila; Thomas J Hope
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.