Literature DB >> 23508599

New york city physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents.

Susan E Rubin1, Katie Davis, M Diane McKee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although the US adolescent pregnancy rate is high, use of the most effective reversible contraceptives-intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implantable contraception-is low. Increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) could decrease adolescent pregnancy rates. We explored New York City primary care physicians' experiences, attitudes, and beliefs about counseling and provision of LARC to adolescents.
METHODS: We conducted in-depth telephone interviews with 28 family physicians, pediatricians, and obstetrician-gynecologists using an interview guide based on an implementation science theoretical framework. After an iterative coding and analytic process, findings were interpreted using the capability (knowledge and skills), opportunity (environmental factors), and motivation (attitudes and beliefs) conceptual model of behavior change.
RESULTS: Enablers to IUD counseling and provision include knowledge that nulliparous adolescents are appropriate IUD candidates (capability) and opportunity factors, such as (1) a clinical environment supportive of adolescent contraception, (2) IUD availability in clinic, and (3) the ability to insert IUDs or easy access to an someone who can. Factors enabling motivation include belief in the overall positive consequences of IUD use; this is particularly influenced by a physicians' perception of adolescents' risk of pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease. Physicians rarely counsel about implantable contraception because of knowledge gaps (capability) and limited access to the device (opportunity).
CONCLUSION: Knowledge, skills, clinical environment, and physician attitudes, all influence the likelihood a physician will counsel or insert LARC for adolescents. Interventions to increase adolescents' access to LARC in primary care must be tailored to individual clinical practice sites and practicing physicians, the methods must be made more affordable, and residency programs should offer up-to-date, evidence-based teaching.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23508599      PMCID: PMC3601390          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  24 in total

1.  Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach.

Authors:  S Michie; M Johnston; C Abraham; R Lawton; D Parker; A Walker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-02

Review 2.  Contraception and adolescents.

Authors:  Margaret J Blythe; Angela Diaz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  A comparison of contraceptive procurement pre- and post-benefit change.

Authors:  Debbie Postlethwaite; James Trussell; Anthony Zoolakis; Ruth Shabear; Diana Petitti
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  J Joseph Speidel; Cynthia C Harper; Wayne C Shields
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Postabortion contraception: qualitative interviews on counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Jessica Morse; Lori Freedman; J Joseph Speidel; Kirsten M J Thompson; Laura Stratton; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-04-24

6.  Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: levels and trends in developed countries.

Authors:  S Singh; J E Darroch
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

7.  The use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among young men and women.

Authors:  J S Santelli; C W Warren; R Lowry; E Sogolow; J Collins; L Kann; R B Kaufmann; D D Celentano
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

8.  Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Maya Blum; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Philip D Darney; J Joseph Speidel; Michael Policar; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use.

Authors:  David J Landry; Junhow Wei; Jennifer J Frost
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Kathryn Kost; Susheela Singh; Barbara Vaughan; James Trussell; Akinrinola Bankole
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  19 in total

1.  Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City.

Authors:  Julia Potter; Susan E Rubin; Peter Sherman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Contraceptive Choice among Adolescent School-Based Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Aletha Y Akers; Kym R Ahrens
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.814

4.  Health Care Provider Attitudes about the Safety of "Quick Start" Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents.

Authors:  Isabel A Morgan; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  Counseling Adolescents About the Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Comparison of Primary Care Pediatricians With Family Physicians and Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the Bronx, New York.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Hillel W Cohen; John S Santelli; M Diane McKee
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2015-01-27

6.  Improving LARC Access for Urban Adolescents and Young Adults in the Pediatric Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  Uche F Onyewuchi; Kathy Tomaszewski; Krishna K Upadhya; Priya S Gupta; Natalie Whaley; Anne E Burke; Maria E Trent
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 1.168

7.  Louisiana and Mississippi Family Physicians' Contraception Counseling for Adolescents with a Focus on Intrauterine Contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Lauren N Coy; Qingzhao Yu; Herbert L Muncie
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.814

8.  Primary care physicians' concerns may affect adolescents' access to intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Giselle Campos; Susan Markens
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2012-11-04

9.  Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Eve Waltermaurer; Natasha Miller; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

10.  Interdependent Barriers to Providing Adolescents with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Qualitative Insights from Providers.

Authors:  Molly K Murphy; Cindy Stoffel; Meghan Nolan; Sadia Haider
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.814

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.