Literature DB >> 21477692

Determinants of intrauterine contraception provision among US family physicians: a national survey of knowledge, attitudes and practice.

Susan E Rubin1, Jason Fletcher, Tara Stein, Penina Segall-Gutierrez, Marji Gold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor contraception adherence contributes to unintended pregnancy. Intrauterine contraception (IUC) is user-independent thus adherence is not an issue, yet few US women use IUC. We compared family physicians (FPs) who do and do not insert IUC in order to ascertain determinants of inserting IUC. STUDY
DESIGN: We surveyed 3500 US FPs. The primary outcome variable was whether a physician inserts IUC in their current clinical practice. We also sought to describe their clinical practice with IUC insertions.
RESULTS: FPs who insert IUC had better knowledge about IUC (adjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.32-2.60), more comfort discussing IUC (adjusted OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.30-4.27), and were more likely to believe their patients are receptive to discussing IUC (adjusted OR 2.96, 95% CI 2.03-4.32). The more IUC inserted during residency, the more likely to insert currently (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12-1.84). Only 24% of respondents inserted IUC in the prior 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: US FPs have training and knowledge gaps, as well as attitudes, that result in missed opportunities to discuss and provide IUC for all eligible patients.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21477692     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  18 in total

1.  Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Knowledge is necessary but insufficient to change provider attitudes about intrauterine devices for adolescents.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Counseling Adolescents About the Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Comparison of Primary Care Pediatricians With Family Physicians and Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the Bronx, New York.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Hillel W Cohen; John S Santelli; M Diane McKee
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2015-01-27

4.  Long acting contraception provision by rural primary care physicians.

Authors:  Britt Lunde; Paul Smith; Manpreet Grewal; Tara Kumaraswami; Allison Cowett; Bryna Harwood
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Jillian T Henderson; Tina R Raine; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Kirsten M Thompson; Christine Dehlendorf; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Louisiana and Mississippi Family Physicians' Contraception Counseling for Adolescents with a Focus on Intrauterine Contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Lauren N Coy; Qingzhao Yu; Herbert L Muncie
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Funduscopy in Cerebral Malaria Diagnosis: An International Survey of Practice Patterns.

Authors:  Lakshmi Swamy; Nicholas A V Beare; Ogugua Okonkwo; Tamer H Mahmoud
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Primary care physicians' concerns may affect adolescents' access to intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Giselle Campos; Susan Markens
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2012-11-04

9.  Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Eve Waltermaurer; Natasha Miller; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

10.  US family physicians' intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Mollie B Nisen; Lars E Peterson; Anneli Cochrane; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.