Literature DB >> 20103447

Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes.

Tessa Madden1, Jenifer E Allsworth, Katherine J Hladky, Gina M Secura, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many obstacles to intrauterine contraception (IUC) use exist, including provider and patient misinformation, high upfront cost and clinician practice patterns. The aim of our study was to investigate knowledge and attitudes about IUC among obstetricians and gynecologists in the area of Saint Louis. STUDY
DESIGN: We mailed a self-administered, anonymous survey to 250 clinicians who provide obstetric and gynecologic care in Saint Louis City and County which included questions about demographics, training, family planning visits and intrauterine contraceptive knowledge and use.
RESULTS: The overall survey response rate among eligible clinicians was 73.7%. Clinicians who had recently finished training or saw higher numbers of contraceptive patients per week were more likely to insert IUC than clinicians who completed training prior to 1989 or saw fewer contraceptive patients. Several misconceptions among clinicians were identified, including an association between intrauterine contraceptives and an elevated risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician misconceptions about the risks of IUC continue to occur. Improved clinician education is greatly needed to facilitate the use of these highly effective, long-acting, reversible methods of contraception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20103447      PMCID: PMC2813209          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  Acceptability of the long-term contraceptive levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena): a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Erika Baldaszti; Beate Wimmer-Puchinger; Kathleen Löschke
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study.

Authors:  Satu Suhonen; Maija Haukkamaa; Tell Jakobsson; Ilkka Rauramo
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Non-contraceptive uses of levonorgestrel-releasing hormone system (LNG-IUS)--a systematic enquiry and overview.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Deepali Sinha; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Contraceptive failure in China.

Authors:  Duolao Wang
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Immediate postabortal contraception with the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, Norplant, and traditional methods.

Authors:  N Ortayli; A Bulut; T Sahin; I Sivin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Gladys M Martinez; William D Mosher; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2005-12

9.  Randomized comparison of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine systems immediately after abortion, with 5 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Päivi Pakarinen; Juhani Toivonen; Tapani Luukkainen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  U.S. physicians' views on financing options to expand health insurance coverage: a national survey.

Authors:  Danny McCormick; Steffie Woolhandler; Anjali Bose-Kolanu; Antonio Germann; David H Bor; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  38 in total

1.  Knowledge and Training of Intrauterine Devices Among Primary Care Residents: Implications for Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Aparna Sridhar; Elizabeth Ruppel Forbes; Kelly Mooney; Radhika Rible
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-03

2.  Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Chloe H Dillaway; Caitlin Canfield; Daniela M Kuhn; Katherine S Strandberg; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-03

3.  Positive Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and the Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in IUD Users.

Authors:  Natalia E Birgisson; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Contraception for Adolescents: Focusing on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) to Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

6.  Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Renee Mestad; Gina Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California.

Authors:  Grace Shih; Eric Vittinghoff; Jody Steinauer; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

8.  Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City.

Authors:  Julia Potter; Susan E Rubin; Peter Sherman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Fertility after intrauterine device removal: a pilot study.

Authors:  Amy M Stoddard; Hanna Xu; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Criterion-based screening for sexually transmitted infection: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of commonly used questions.

Authors:  Patricia Aikins Murphy; Janet Jacobson; David K Turok
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.