Literature DB >> 20654760

Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women.

Kendra L Fleming1, Abby Sokoloff, Tina R Raine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about attitudes and beliefs among teenagers and young women about the intrauterine device (IUD). STUDY
DESIGN: We surveyed 252 women, ages 14-27 years, presenting for appointments at an urban family planning clinic about demographics, sexual and birth control history, and opinions about the IUD.
RESULTS: Fifty-five percent had not heard of the IUD. Participants who were parous were 4.4 times more likely to be interested in the IUD than nulliparous participants. Independent of parity, participants who had heard of the IUD from a health care provider were 2.7 times more likely to be interested in using the method. The study population was at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs); however, 82% of participants predicted that they would increase or experience no change in their condom use with an IUD in place.
CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers should be encouraged to talk to teenagers and young women who are at high risk for unintended pregnancy, both parous and nulliparous, about using the IUD. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20654760      PMCID: PMC3153421          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  11 in total

1.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Differences in teenage pregnancy rates among five developed countries: the roles of sexual activity and contraceptive use.

Authors:  J E Darroch; S Singh; J J Frost
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

3.  The trade-off between hormonal contraceptives and condoms among adolescents.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Nancy E Adler; Susan G Millstein; Jeanne M Tschann; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Intrauterine device and upper-genital-tract infection.

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Comparison of continuation rates for hormonal contraception among adolescents.

Authors:  A Zibners; B A Cromer; J Hayes
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002.

Authors:  William D Mosher; Gladys M Martinez; Anjani Chandra; Joyce C Abma; Stephanie J Willson
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2004-12-10

7.  Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Nancy L Stanwood; Karen A Bradley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device.

Authors:  Amy K Whitaker; Lisa M Johnson; Bryna Harwood; Laurel Chiappetta; Mitchell D Creinin; Melanie A Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.

Authors:  T M Farley; M J Rosenberg; P J Rowe; J H Chen; O Meirik
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Maya Blum; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Philip D Darney; J Joseph Speidel; Michael Policar; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  32 in total

1.  Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; J Joseph Speidel; Eleanor A Drey; James Trussell; Maya Blum; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Contraception for Adolescents: Focusing on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) to Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

3.  Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

4.  Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine; Kirsten Thompson; Jillian T Henderson; Maya Blum; Debbie Postlethwaite; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City.

Authors:  Julia Potter; Susan E Rubin; Peter Sherman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Tegan A Hunter; Sarita Sonalkar; Courtney A Schreiber; Lisa K Perriera; Mary D Sammel; Aletha Y Akers
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Jillian T Henderson; Tina R Raine; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Kirsten M Thompson; Christine Dehlendorf; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Identifying counseling needs of nulliparous adolescent intrauterine contraceptive users: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  Margot K Brown; Colette Auerswald; Stephen L Eyre; Julianna Deardorff; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Lori Frohwirth; Jenna Jerman; Ronna Popkin; Kathleen Ethier
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 1.814

10.  Urban Adolescents' and Young Adults' Decision-Making Process around Selection of Intrauterine Contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Marisa Felsher; Faye Korich; Amanda M Jacobs
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.814

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.