Literature DB >> 26842855

The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.

Roberta Etzi1,2, Alberto Gallace3,4.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that during multisensory perception, vision frequently dominates over the other sensory modalities. However, it is still unclear whether sensory dominance also implies the generation of a greater state of arousal. Here, we assess the psycho-physiological reactions to different materials when presented tactually (Group 1) or visually (Group 2). In Group 1, the participants' forearm was stroked with different textures (satin, tinfoil, leather, sandpaper and abrasive sponge), by either a male or a female experimenter. The speed of stimulation was set to elicit a vigorous response of C-tactile afferents, involved in the perception of the more pleasant aspects of touch. The participants were asked to rate the pleasantness of the stimulation. In Group 2, the same textures were presented only visually, and the participants were asked to rate the imagined pleasantness of being touched by those stimuli. Skin conductance responses were recorded in both groups. The results revealed that the tactile presentation of the stimuli led to higher skin conductance responses than the visual presentation; this difference was higher for women than for men. Smooth materials were perceived as more pleasant than rough materials, but no differences in terms of skin conductance responses were found among them. Moreover, the textures were rated as less pleasant when presented visually than when presented tactually. These findings are relevant to understand how physiological arousal is modulated by different senses and to elucidate the mechanisms involved in hedonic tactile perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective touch; Arousal; Skin conductance response; Textures; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26842855     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4574-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

Review 1.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans.

Authors:  F McGlone; H Olausson; J A Boyle; M Jones-Gotman; C Dancer; S Guest; G Essick
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Starting the process of mother-infant bonding.

Authors:  John Kennell; Susan McGrath
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.299

4.  Sensory and affective judgments of skin during inter- and intrapersonal touch.

Authors:  Steve Guest; Greg Essick; Jean Marc Dessirier; Kevin Blot; Kannapon Lopetcharat; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-12-06

5.  Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans.

Authors:  Line S Löken; Johan Wessberg; India Morrison; Francis McGlone; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Sex differences in cardiac and autonomic response to clinical and experimental pain in LBP patients.

Authors:  Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Serge Marchand
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 7.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds.

Authors:  India Morrison; Malin Björnsdotter; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body.

Authors:  Jessica Hartcher-O'Brien; Carmel Levitan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Touch satiety: differential effects of stroking velocity on liking and wanting touch over repetitions.

Authors:  Chantal Triscoli; Rochelle Ackerley; Uta Sailer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stroking and tapping the skin: behavioral and electrodermal effects.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Carlotta Carta; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dynamic touch reduces physiological arousal in preterm infants: A role for c-tactile afferents?

Authors:  Andrea Manzotti; Francesco Cerritelli; Jorge E Esteves; Gianluca Lista; Erica Lombardi; Simona La Rocca; Alberto Gallace; Francis P McGlone; Susannah C Walker
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 6.464

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.