Literature DB >> 29214391

Stroking and tapping the skin: behavioral and electrodermal effects.

Roberta Etzi1, Carlotta Carta2, Alberto Gallace2.   

Abstract

Being caressed represents one of the most typical expressions of affection conveyed by touch. Converging evidence suggests that the pleasant perception of gentle and slow stroking delivered to the hairy skin is mediated by C-Tactile afferents (CTs). While behavioral and neural responses to CT-optimal touch have been moderately explored so far, less is known about the autonomic reaction to different kinds of touch (both CT-optimal and not). Here, we investigated whether physiological arousal varies as a function of the specific tactile stimulation provided. Stroking (slow: 3 cm/s 'CT-optimal'; or fast: 30 cm/s) and tapping (random or fixed spatial order) stimulations were delivered to the participants' forearm with a brush, for durations of 9 or 60 s. Participants' skin conductance response (SCR) and level (SCL), as well as subjective evaluations, were recorded. The results revealed that being stroked (at both the velocities) induced higher SCR and SCL than being tapped. Moreover, while higher SCR was elicited by CT-suboptimal stroking compared to CT-optimal stroking, SCL was not affected differently by CT-optimal touch. No differences were found between the effects of 9 and 60 s stimulations. Slow stroking was evaluated as the most pleasant, relaxing and 'social' type of touch compared to the other tactile stimulations. Taken together, these findings shed light on the psychophysiological responses to stroking (including CT-optimal touch) and tapping, and contribute to elucidate the mechanisms underlying hedonic tactile perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective touch; Arousal; CT afferents; Skin conductance; Stroking; Tapping

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29214391     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5143-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  63 in total

1.  Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch.

Authors:  Ilanit Gordon; Avery C Voos; Randi H Bennett; Danielle Z Bolling; Kevin A Pelphrey; Martha D Kaiser
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans.

Authors:  F McGlone; H Olausson; J A Boyle; M Jones-Gotman; C Dancer; S Guest; G Essick
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans.

Authors:  Line S Löken; Johan Wessberg; India Morrison; Francis McGlone; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Positive couple interactions and daily cortisol: on the stress-protecting role of intimacy.

Authors:  Beate Ditzen; Christiane Hoppmann; Petra Klumb
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Autistic traits are associated with diminished neural response to affective touch.

Authors:  Avery C Voos; Kevin A Pelphrey; Martha D Kaiser
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant touch at CT-optimized velocity.

Authors:  Chantal Triscoli; Ilona Croy; Susann Steudte-Schmiedgen; Håkan Olausson; Uta Sailer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Warm partner contact is related to lower cardiovascular reactivity.

Authors:  Karen M Grewen; Bobbi J Anderson; Susan S Girdler; Kathleen C Light
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.104

8.  Touch satiety: differential effects of stroking velocity on liking and wanting touch over repetitions.

Authors:  Chantal Triscoli; Rochelle Ackerley; Uta Sailer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch.

Authors:  Louise P Kirsch; Charlotte Krahé; Nadia Blom; Laura Crucianelli; Valentina Moro; Paul M Jenkinson; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Responses Predict Perceived Pleasantness of Skin Stroking.

Authors:  Monika Davidovic; Emma H Jönsson; Håkan Olausson; Malin Björnsdotter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Defining pleasant touch stimuli: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Håkan Olausson; Mats Trulsson; Peter Svensson; Lene Baad-Hansen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-19

2.  Dynamic touch reduces physiological arousal in preterm infants: A role for c-tactile afferents?

Authors:  Andrea Manzotti; Francesco Cerritelli; Jorge E Esteves; Gianluca Lista; Erica Lombardi; Simona La Rocca; Alberto Gallace; Francis P McGlone; Susannah C Walker
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 6.464

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.