Literature DB >> 22594914

Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans.

F McGlone1, H Olausson, J A Boyle, M Jones-Gotman, C Dancer, S Guest, G Essick.   

Abstract

Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in two rare patients, together with microneurography and psychophysical observations in healthy subjects, have demonstrated a system of mechanosensitive C-fiber tactile (CT) afferents sensitive to slowly moving stimuli. They project to the posterior insular cortex and signal pleasant aspects of touch. Importantly, CTs have not been found in the glabrous skin of the hand, yet it is commonly observed that glabrous skin touch is also perceived as pleasant. Here we asked if the brain processing of pleasant touch differs between hairy and glabrous skin by stroking the forearm and glabrous skin of the hand during positron emission tomography. The data showed that, when contrasting slow brush stroking on the forearm with slow brush stroking on the palm, there were significant activations of the posterior insular cortex and mid-anterior orbitofrontal cortex. The opposite contrast showed a significant activation of the somatosensory cortices. Although concurrent psychophysical ratings showed no differences in intensity or pleasantness ratings, a subsequent touch questionnaire in which subjects used a newly developed 'touch perception task' showed significant difference for the two body sites. Emotional descriptors received higher ratings on the forearm and sensory descriptors were rated more highly on the palm. The present findings are consistent with the hypothesis that pleasant touch from hairy skin, mediated by CT afferents, is processed in the limbic-related cortex and represents an innate non-learned process. In contrast, pleasant touch from glabrous skin, mediated by A-beta afferents, is processed in the somatosensory cortex and represents an analytical process dependent on previous tactile experiences.
© 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2012 Federation of European Neuroscience Soieties and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22594914     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08092.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  79 in total

1.  Tactile representation of the head and shoulders assessed by fMRI in the nonhuman primate.

Authors:  Claire Wardak; Olivier Guipponi; Serge Pinède; Suliann Ben Hamed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

3.  Investigating the neural processing of spatial summation of pain: the role of A-delta nociceptors.

Authors:  Netta Raz; Yelena Granovsky; Ruth Defrin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Methodological Considerations for the Temporal Summation of Second Pain.

Authors:  Nathanial R Eckert; Charles J Vierck; Corey B Simon; Sachell Calderon; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roland Staud; Roger B Fillingim; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 5.  Tactile suppression in goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Gordon Binsted; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

6.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Methamphetamine dependent individuals show attenuated brain response to pleasant interoceptive stimuli.

Authors:  April C May; Jennifer L Stewart; Robyn Migliorini; Susan F Tapert; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Testing Assumptions in Human Pain Models: Psychophysical Differences Between First and Second Pain.

Authors:  Nathanial R Eckert; Charles J Vierck; Corey B Simon; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roger B Fillingim; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Stroking and tapping the skin: behavioral and electrodermal effects.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Carlotta Carta; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  fNIRS detects temporal lobe response to affective touch.

Authors:  Randi H Bennett; Danielle Z Bolling; Laura C Anderson; Kevin A Pelphrey; Martha D Kaiser
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.